A participation activity is now addressed to the Festipod app actor alone and
handled on reception in the app's inbox, the way the ActivityPods developer
advised: use the ActivityPub protocol rather than a side channel. Any
compatible sender may deliver; the inbox accepts only the activity's own
signer, and the backend still requires the activity to lie in that actor's pod
and acts on the stored copy.
The meeting point is read again in its creator's pod before anything is
written: read through the participant's pod, a foreign server's proxy chose
the attendee list and the notification's name.
Confidentiality is unchanged: the Join stays readable by its author and the
app only. Recorded in decision_2026-11-03_participation-delivered-to-the-app,
a named exception to festipod-only-reference-app-patterns.
Participation privacy (decision_2026-10-29_participation-privacy-mechanism):
a sign-up is a private Join naming the meeting point, addressed to nobody,
handled by the backend on emission. Attendee lists hold member URNs hashed
from (WebID, event, a secret kept in the participant's profile), so counts
stay public and only contacts recognise anyone; the creator has no read
right and is notified anonymously. Each person's participations collection,
created by the backend at the first sign-up, is readable by their /contacts
WAC group only, never world-readable. The member URN is sticky per
(meeting point, participant) and every collection write is verified by
reading back, so a refused write leaves the act unrecorded and retryable.
The EventRef mechanism and its browser-side provisioning are gone.
The backend now runs with WebACL on, as the reference apps do, on its own
secure datasets festipod / settings-festipod instead of the pod provider's
settings dataset; pod-notifications needs it. The compose header and the
deployment leaf say how to reset a stack whose datasets predate this.
The rights matrix covers the new mechanism live (148 hard lines), including
a forged contact Accept between throwaway accounts: the stranger enters the
contacts list (platform defect, reported upstream) but is refused the profile
and the participations. Tests may attack as long as they never break the dev
environment (rule_tests-never-break-the-dev-environment).
Also lands the coherence-pass work that was still uncommitted: contacts as
the Pod's social graph and invite links, image upload to the Pod, the
meeting-point form, profile completion gate, and the doctrine for them.
Superseded briefs and decisions are deleted rather than annotated.
Sylvain Duchesne