fix: un abonnement en échec n'empoisonne plus le document, et un dépôt ne change plus de destinataire

.project/concepts/app-contract/_debt.md

@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 
 ## Raw markers (consolidate into blocks, then delete)
 - TOUCHED packages/polyfill/src/surface/subscribe.ts @2026-08-17 (session f93872b5-293a-4916-a353-181409a96d42)
+- TOUCHED packages/polyfill/src/surface/inbox.ts @2026-08-17 (session f93872b5-293a-4916-a353-181409a96d42)

packages/polyfill/src/emulated-verifier/connect.ts

@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@
  *      new Link durably and puts it among what the user holds.
  *   3. **Keep applying** — start watching those same inboxes, for as long as this identity
  *      stays connected (`emulated-verifier/inbox-observer.ts`). Step 2 is the backlog;
- *      this is the regime.
+ *      this is the regime. It runs whatever became of the first two, including a step 1 that
+ *      REJECTED: what is watched is *being connected*, and `setCurrentUser` has already made
+ *      that true by the time any of this runs.
  *
  * Restoring first means a reconnecting user can read its documents immediately, without
  * waiting on the inbox round-trip; watching last means the backlog is applied before the
@@ -164,7 +166,7 @@ export async function connectedUser(): Promise<void> {
   // Captured with the identity, handed back at filing time — see `caps.holderKey`.
   const holderKey = getCaps().holderKey();
 
-  const run = (async (): Promise<void> => {
+  const restoreAndDrain = async (): Promise<void> => {
     // Connecting must not PROVISION. `ensureAccount` would create the user on
     // first sight, so connecting an identity that does not exist yet would
     // silently mint its stores and their caps — arming the whole emulation as a
@@ -186,8 +188,7 @@ export async function connectedUser(): Promise<void> {
       // answers `[]` for an identity with no account) and is what makes that first session
       // behave like every other one — the alternative was a brand-new user watched from
       // their SECOND visit onwards, which is precisely the person most likely to be sent
-      // something.
+      // something. (Started below, for every outcome of this function alike.)
-      if (stillConnected()) await startObservingInboxes();
       return;
     }
     if (!stillConnected()) return;
@@ -226,24 +227,44 @@ export async function connectedUser(): Promise<void> {
         reportUndrained(inbox, error);
       }
     }
-    // 3. …and from here on, KEEP applying. The backlog above is the special case, not the
+  };
-    //    rule: upstream a session is handed each inbox message as it arrives and applies it
+
-    //    inline, and only the messages waiting at connection are the "queue"
+  const run = (async (): Promise<void> => {
-    //    (`from_queue`). Draining once and stopping made a deposit wait for the recipient
+    try {
-    //    to reload the page. See `emulated-verifier/inbox-observer.ts`.
+      await restoreAndDrain();
-    //
+    } finally {
-    //    After the drain, not before: connecting owes the backlog first, and the
+      // 3. …and from here on, KEEP applying. The backlog above is the special case, not the
-    //    observation subscribes to the same inboxes this loop just read.
+      //    rule: upstream a session is handed each inbox message as it arrives and applies it
-    //
+      //    inline, and only the messages waiting at connection are the "queue"
-    //    Unconditional on the loop's outcome, deliberately. An inbox that could not be
+      //    (`from_queue`). Draining once and stopping made a deposit wait for the recipient
-    //    drained is reported and denies nobody their session, and it must not deny them the
+      //    to reload the page. See `emulated-verifier/inbox-observer.ts`.
-    //    observation of the OTHER inboxes either — nor of itself, since the next push is a
+      //
-    //    fresh attempt at exactly the deposit that failed.
+      //    After the restore and the drain, not before: connecting owes the backlog first,
-    //    Awaited, and it never rejects: what connecting starts, connecting finishes, so a
+      //    and the observation subscribes to the same inboxes that loop just read.
-    //    caller that got its promise back knows the watching is in place — not merely
+      //
-    //    requested. (It does not wait for the applying that watching then triggers.)
+      //    ── Unconditional on how they WENT, and that is the whole point ──
-    if (!stillConnected()) return;
+      //    An inbox that could not be drained is reported and denies nobody their session,
-    await startObservingInboxes();
+      //    and it must not deny them the observation of the OTHER inboxes either — nor of
+      //    itself, since the next push is a fresh attempt at exactly the deposit that failed.
+      //
+      //    The same holds one step up, and until 2026-08-17 it did not: a restore that
+      //    REJECTED skipped this line, and the identity was left CONNECTED — `setCurrentUser`
+      //    is synchronous and had already taken effect — with nothing watching its inboxes
+      //    for the rest of the session. `startObservingInboxes` has no other caller, so one
+      //    broker hiccup at sign-in cost that person every deposit made from then on, in
+      //    silence, long after the broker had recovered.
+      //
+      //    It does not blur the rule this function is built on. The rule is about what the
+      //    CALLER is told — failing to reach the queues rejects, failing to apply one is
+      //    reported — and rejecting is exactly what still happens: the error raised above
+      //    propagates through this `finally` untouched. What changes is that being connected
+      //    now means being watched, whatever the connection made of its own work.
+      //
+      //    Awaited, and it never rejects: what connecting starts, connecting finishes, so a
+      //    caller that got its promise back knows the watching is in place — not merely
+      //    requested. (It does not wait for the applying that watching then triggers.)
+      if (stillConnected()) await startObservingInboxes();
+    }
   })();
 
   inFlight.set(holder, run);

packages/polyfill/src/emulated-verifier/inbox-observer.ts

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ import { myInboxes } from "./branch-registers";
 import { drainInboxSerially, drainsSettled } from "./inbox-drain";
 import { lookupAccount } from "../shared-wallet/account-registry";
 import { processInbox } from "../surface/inbox";
-import { subscribeDoc, type Unsubscribe } from "../surface/subscribe";
+import { subscribeDoc, subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure, type Unsubscribe } from "../surface/subscribe";
 import type { Nuri, PrincipalId } from "../model/types";
 
 /**
@@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ interface Observation {
   register: Unsubscribe | null;
   /** Unsubscribe from the held-caps change signal — the second "which inboxes" channel. */
   holdings: Unsubscribe | null;
+  /**
+   * The inboxes whose subscription has already been re-attempted once after failing to be
+   * OPENED. What bounds the repair below to one extra try per inbox, so a document the broker
+   * genuinely cannot serve costs two calls rather than a loop.
+   */
+  reattempted: Set<Nuri>;
   /** True while a re-enumeration is running, so its own effects do not restart it. */
   enumerating: boolean;
   /** A trigger that arrived mid-cycle: the running one repeats once rather than lose it. */
@@ -128,21 +134,30 @@ async function applyWhatArrived(obs: Observation, inbox: Nuri): Promise<void> {
   if (!current(obs)) return;
   await drainInboxSerially(inbox, async () => {
     // Re-checked INSIDE the queue: this run may have waited behind another one, and the
-    // identity can have moved while it waited. `processInbox` resolves the holder at each
+    // identity can have moved while it waited. Running it for the wrong holder is not a
-    // of its steps, so running it for the wrong one is not a near-miss — it reads someone
+    // near-miss — it reads someone else's registers and files into someone else's ring.
-    // else's registers and files into someone else's ring.
+    //
+    // This check is NECESSARY and it is not SUFFICIENT, and until 2026-08-17 this comment
+    // claimed it was. It cannot be: the identity can move after it passes, while
+    // `processInbox` is mid-read. The claim was that `processInbox` "resolves the holder at
+    // each step, so the new holder is refused an inbox that is not theirs somewhere in the
+    // middle" — but its ownership guard runs ONCE, at entry, and a switch after that reached
+    // the filing with nobody left to refuse it. What it filed was the previous holder's cap,
+    // into the new holder's ring, durably. The guard that makes this run safe is therefore
+    // the one INSIDE `processInbox`, which captures the holder its guard authorised; this one
+    // only spares the work when the switch is already visible.
     if (!current(obs)) return;
     try {
       await processInbox(inbox);
     } catch (error) {
-      // An identity that moved MID-DRAIN throws here too, and it is the ordinary case rather
+      // An identity that moved MID-DRAIN can throw here too — the switch may land before
-      // than an exotic one: `processInbox` resolves the holder at each step, so the new
+      // `processInbox`'s own ownership guard, which then refuses the new holder an inbox that
-      // holder is refused an inbox that is not theirs somewhere in the middle. That is
+      // is not theirs. (Landing after it, the run ABANDONS quietly instead and returns; both
-      // ABANDONING — which this package has always called "not a failure" — and reporting it
+      // leave the deposit where it is.) Abandoning is what this package has always called
-      // would put a broker-looking error in the log every time a page switches user.
+      // "not a failure", and reporting it would put a broker-looking error in the log every
-      // Nothing is lost: an inbox is not consumed by being abandoned, so the deposit is
+      // time a page switches user. Nothing is lost: an inbox is not consumed by being
-      // still there for its owner's next connection. Same rule, same words, as the drain
+      // abandoned, so the deposit is still there for its owner's next connection. Same rule,
-      // loop in `connect.connectedUser`.
+      // same words, as the drain loop in `connect.connectedUser`.
       if (!current(obs)) return;
       throw error;
     }
@@ -175,9 +190,19 @@ async function watchTheInboxes(obs: Observation): Promise<void> {
       // `State`, which drains an inbox connection has usually just drained — idempotent,
       // and the alternative (skip the first) would lose a deposit that landed in the gap
       // between the two.
+      //
+      // The failure channel is not decoration: `subscribeDoc` returns SYNCHRONOUSLY and its
+      // one real `doc_subscribe` is opened afterwards, so a rejection there reaches nobody.
+      // Without it, this map held an entry for an inbox that was never watched, the loop
+      // above skipped it at every later enumeration, and the only observable difference from
+      // a healthy session was that shares stopped arriving.
       obs.inboxes.set(
         inbox,
-        subscribeDoc(inbox, () => track(obs, applyWhatArrived(obs, inbox))),
+        subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure(
+          inbox,
+          () => track(obs, applyWhatArrived(obs, inbox)),
+          (error) => watchFailed(obs, inbox, error),
+        ),
       );
       logStage("OBSERVING " + shortNuri(inbox) + " for " + obs.holder);
     } catch (error) {
@@ -186,6 +211,39 @@ async function watchTheInboxes(obs: Observation): Promise<void> {
   }
 }
 
+/**
+ * The subscription on `inbox` could not be OPENED — report it, forget it, and try once more.
+ *
+ * **Forget it**, because the entry this observation holds is the whole record of "already
+ * watched": leaving a dead one in place is how one rejection at connection turned into a
+ * session-long silence. Removed, the next enumeration subscribes again as if it had never
+ * been attempted.
+ *
+ * **Try once more**, because the usual cause is a repo the verifier has not synced yet, and
+ * the whole cost of finding out is one call. Exactly one extra attempt per inbox, tracked in
+ * {@link Observation.reattempted}: a broker that genuinely cannot serve this document must
+ * not be asked again and again by a loop that has no reason to stop. If the second attempt
+ * fails too, the failure has been reported twice and the inbox waits for the next
+ * enumeration signal — or for the next connection, where an unapplied deposit has always
+ * waited.
+ */
+function watchFailed(obs: Observation, inbox: Nuri, error: unknown): void {
+  if (!current(obs)) return;
+  const stale = obs.inboxes.get(inbox);
+  obs.inboxes.delete(inbox);
+  if (stale) {
+    try {
+      stale();
+    } catch (thrown) {
+      console.error(accessLogPrefix() + " releasing a failed inbox observation failed:", thrown);
+    }
+  }
+  reportUnobserved("this inbox could not be watched: " + shortNuri(inbox), error);
+  if (obs.reattempted.has(inbox)) return;
+  obs.reattempted.add(inbox);
+  track(obs, enumerate(obs));
+}
+
 /**
  * Follow the register that says which inboxes exist, so one opened MID-SESSION is picked
  * up. See the module header: `openDocumentInbox` appends its record to the User branch of
@@ -279,6 +337,7 @@ export async function startObservingInboxes(): Promise<void> {
     inboxes: new Map(),
     register: null,
     holdings: null,
+    reattempted: new Set(),
     enumerating: false,
     enumerateAgain: false,
     pending: new Set(),

packages/polyfill/src/surface/inbox.ts

@@ -669,16 +669,47 @@ export async function readSyncedForDocument(docLike: NuriLike): Promise<Deposit[
  * Idempotent: `addLink` ignores a Link it already holds, so processing twice (a
  * second tab, a reconnect) costs nothing. Returns the consumer deposits, exactly as
  * {@link read} does — Links are never surfaced.
+ *
+ * ── The holder is captured, not re-resolved after the read ────────────────
+ * The ownership guard runs at entry (inside {@link readSynced}) and the FILING happens a
+ * broker round-trip later, so re-asking `getCurrentUser()` at that point asks a different
+ * question: not "whose inbox is this" but "who is holding the page NOW". A page that
+ * switched identity in that window filed CAROL's cap, deposited for ALICE, durably into
+ * BOB's ring — `documentsGivenTo("bob")` returns Carol's document, Alice gets nothing, and
+ * Bob's next sign-in restores it as a capability he holds. Not a near-miss: one user is
+ * given another's document and the real recipient is left with none.
+ *
+ * So the holder the guard authorised is the one the filing is checked against, and a switch
+ * ABANDONS — the same answer {@link read} gives for its own half of this window, and the
+ * same one `connect.connectedUser` gives for a drain it started. Nothing is lost: an inbox
+ * is not consumed by being read, so the deposit is still there for its owner's next
+ * connection or its next push. Filing it FOR the absent owner instead would be a write on
+ * somebody else's store from a published call — which is the deferred processor's
+ * deliberate, unpublished privilege (`emulated-verifier/inbox-processor.ts`), not this one's.
  */
 // @provenance inbox.processInbox kind=aligned level=1 ref=engine/verifier/src/inbox_processor.rs:process_inbox — unseal-and-apply: Links are filed durably and never surfaced. Returning the remaining deposits is the divergent half it shares with `read`
 export async function processInbox(targetInboxLike: NuriLike): Promise<Deposit[]> {
   const targetInbox = toNuri(targetInboxLike, "inbox.processInbox");
+  // WHO this processing is for, captured before the read that authorises it — see above.
+  const holder = getCurrentUser();
   const deposits = await readSynced(targetInbox);
   // `readSynced` already put every Link in memory for this session; now make
   // them durable. Reading the raw deposits again would mean re-parsing, so the caps
   // are taken from what the read just observed.
-  for (const cap of capsSeenIn(targetInbox)) await addLink(cap);
+  const seen = capsSeenIn(targetInbox);
   seenByInbox.delete(targetInbox);
+  for (const cap of seen) {
+    // Re-checked per cap, not once: `addLink` reads and writes, so the identity can move
+    // between two of them just as easily as during the read.
+    if (getCurrentUser() !== holder) {
+      logStage(
+        "ABANDONED " + shortNuri(targetInbox) + " — the identity changed while it was being " +
+          "processed; its deposits stay for their owner",
+      );
+      return deposits;
+    }
+    await addLink(cap, holder ?? undefined);
+  }
   return deposits;
 }
 

packages/polyfill/src/surface/subscribe.ts

@@ -61,6 +61,19 @@
  * it — without the replay, joining a document somebody else already opened would never
  * fire, and `inbox.watch`'s "fires once immediately" would silently stop being true.
  * The real subscription is torn down when the LAST listener leaves.
+ *
+ * ── What SHARING one subscription must not cost a caller ───────────────────
+ * Three things a per-caller `doc_subscribe` gave for free, and that the fan-out has to give
+ * back deliberately — each of them was lost when it was introduced on 2026-08-17:
+ *
+ *   - a caller is ITSELF, not its handler. One record per CALL, so passing the same function
+ *     twice is two subscriptions and the first unsubscribe does not silence the second;
+ *   - a caller that has LEFT hears nothing more, including from the push during which it
+ *     left — a handler may tear another one down, and the pushes are re-checked against the
+ *     live set rather than a copy taken before the first handler ran;
+ *   - a setup that FAILED is not the end of the document. The attempt is forgotten so the
+ *     next joiner makes its own (upstream, each caller's own `doc_subscribe` retried), and
+ *     it is reported rather than left as silence — see {@link reportSetupFailure}.
  */
 
 import { getConfig, getStoreRegistryDeps } from "../shared-wallet/bootstrap";
@@ -122,16 +135,51 @@ async function sessionId(): Promise<string | number> {
 /** What a listener is handed on every push. */
 type Listener = (r: DocChange, type: DocChangeType) => void;
 
+/**
+ * ONE call to {@link subscribeDocUnguarded}, and what that caller asked for.
+ *
+ * Identified by this record and never by the `onChange` function: two callers may
+ * legitimately pass the SAME function — a module-level handler, a bound method, an arrow
+ * that closes over nothing — and they are two subscriptions with two independent lifetimes.
+ * Keyed by the function, the second call was swallowed by the set and the FIRST caller's
+ * unsubscribe silenced the second, which had never asked to leave.
+ */
+interface DocListener {
+  /** What this caller is handed on every push. */
+  onChange: Listener;
+  /**
+   * Told when the one real `doc_subscribe` behind this listener could not be OPENED.
+   *
+   * Upstream `doc_subscribe` is async and REJECTS on a setup failure, so its caller learns.
+   * This wrapper returns synchronously, so without this channel a caller cannot tell "this
+   * document is quiet" from "this document is not subscribed at all" — the failure-as-absence
+   * this package keeps closing. `null` for a caller that did not ask (the published
+   * {@link subscribeDoc}, whose contract has no such argument); the failure is logged either
+   * way.
+   */
+  onSetupFailed: ((error: unknown) => void) | null;
+}
+
 /**
  * The single real `doc_subscribe` behind every local listener on one document.
  * See the module header for why there can only be one.
  */
 interface DocFanOut {
   /** Every local listener on this document. The last one to leave tears it down. */
-  listeners: Set<Listener>;
+  listeners: Set<DocListener>;
   /** The platform's unsubscribe, once the async setup resolved. */
   realUnsub: (() => void) | null;
-  /** True from the moment setup is kicked off — a later joiner must not kick off a second. */
+  /**
+   * True from the moment a setup is kicked off — a later joiner must not kick off a second,
+   * because a second `doc_subscribe` on a branch EVICTS the first (see the module header).
+   * It therefore stays true once the setup has SUCCEEDED: the attempt still stands.
+   *
+   * Cleared on the two ways the attempt stops standing: the last listener leaving
+   * ({@link releaseFanOut}), and a setup that FAILED ({@link reportSetupFailure}). Left true
+   * on failure it stopped meaning "one is already running" and started meaning "this NURI is
+   * finished" — no later joiner ever attempted it again, for the whole session, over one
+   * transient rejection.
+   */
   establishing: boolean;
   /**
    * The most recent `State` push, replayed to a listener that joins later.
@@ -143,14 +191,57 @@ interface DocFanOut {
 const fanOuts = new Map<Nuri, DocFanOut>();
 
 /** Hand one push to one listener, isolating a throwing handler from the others. */
-function deliver(nuri: Nuri, listener: Listener, resp: DocChange, type: DocChangeType): void {
+function deliver(nuri: Nuri, listener: DocListener, resp: DocChange, type: DocChangeType): void {
   try {
-    listener(resp, type);
+    listener.onChange(resp, type);
   } catch (error) {
     console.error("[subscribe] onChange handler threw for", nuri, error);
   }
 }
 
+/**
+ * Hand one push to every listener of `entry` — the fan-out itself.
+ *
+ * Over a COPY, because a handler may unsubscribe itself or another from inside the push; and
+ * re-checking each listener against the live set, because a copy alone only stops the walk
+ * from breaking — it still delivers to whoever left DURING it. That contradicted what
+ * {@link subscribeDoc} publishes ("no further `onChange` fires after unsubscribe"), on the
+ * one ordering an application cannot control: whether its handler runs before or after the
+ * one that tore it down.
+ */
+function fanOut(nuri: Nuri, entry: DocFanOut, resp: DocChange, type: DocChangeType): void {
+  for (const listener of [...entry.listeners]) {
+    if (!entry.listeners.has(listener)) continue;
+    deliver(nuri, listener, resp, type);
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The one real subscription could not be OPENED: forget the attempt, and say so.
+ *
+ * Two halves, and the shape of every "failure disguised as an absence" this package has
+ * closed. **Retryable** — `establishing` goes back to false, so the next `subscribeDoc` on
+ * this NURI attempts it again instead of joining a fan-out that will never push. Left true,
+ * one transient rejection made the document silent for every later joiner in the session.
+ * **Visible** — the log always, plus the callers who asked to be told, so a caller whose job
+ * depends on the subscription (the inbox observation) can report it and try again rather
+ * than sit on a dead entry.
+ */
+function reportSetupFailure(nuri: Nuri, entry: DocFanOut, error: unknown): void {
+  console.error("[subscribe] doc_subscribe failed for", nuri, error);
+  entry.establishing = false;
+  if (fanOuts.get(nuri) !== entry) return;
+  for (const listener of [...entry.listeners]) {
+    const tell = listener.onSetupFailed;
+    if (tell === null || !entry.listeners.has(listener)) continue;
+    try {
+      tell(error);
+    } catch (thrown) {
+      console.error("[subscribe] onSetupFailed handler threw for", nuri, thrown);
+    }
+  }
+}
+
 /** Drop a fan-out: forget the remembered state and release the real subscription. */
 function releaseFanOut(nuri: Nuri, entry: DocFanOut): void {
   if (fanOuts.get(nuri) === entry) fanOuts.delete(nuri);
@@ -187,8 +278,7 @@ async function establish(nuri: Nuri, entry: DocFanOut, ng: { doc_subscribe?: unk
       const type = docChangeType(resp);
       // Remember the barrier for whoever joins next; a later `State` replaces it.
       if (type === "State") entry.lastState = { resp, type };
-      // A copy: a handler may unsubscribe itself (or another) from inside the push.
+      fanOut(nuri, entry, resp, type);
-      for (const listener of [...entry.listeners]) deliver(nuri, listener, resp, type);
     })) as (() => void) | undefined;
     if (fanOuts.get(nuri) !== entry || entry.listeners.size === 0) {
       // Everyone left (or the fan-out was reset) before setup resolved — cancel now.
@@ -197,7 +287,7 @@ async function establish(nuri: Nuri, entry: DocFanOut, ng: { doc_subscribe?: unk
     }
     entry.realUnsub = typeof unsub === "function" ? unsub : null;
   } catch (error) {
-    console.error("[subscribe] doc_subscribe failed for", nuri, error);
+    reportSetupFailure(nuri, entry, error);
   }
 }
 
@@ -291,6 +381,30 @@ export function subscribeDoc(
   return subscribeDocUnguarded(nuri, onChange);
 }
 
+/**
+ * {@link subscribeDoc}, for a caller that must be TOLD when the subscription could not be
+ * opened. Same guard, same fan-out; the only difference is that a setup failure reaches
+ * `onSetupFailed` instead of only the log.
+ *
+ * Internal, and deliberately not the published shape: upstream `doc_subscribe` is async and
+ * rejects, so a failure has a caller to reach; ours returns synchronously, and the published
+ * signature has no room for it (`.project/concepts/app-contract/polyfill-surface/`). An
+ * application uses a subscription as a change SIGNAL and has nothing to do with the answer,
+ * so it keeps the two-argument call. The inbox observation does have something to do with it
+ * — an inbox it believes it is watching and is not leaves every deposit unapplied for the
+ * session — so it asks.
+ */
+// @provenance subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure kind=aligned level=2 ref=sdk/js/lib-wasm/src/lib.rs:doc_subscribe — restores to an internal caller what upstream's async `doc_subscribe` gives every caller: the setup failure. One delta remains, the synchronous unsubscribe
+export function subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure(
+  nuriLike: NuriLike,
+  onChange: (r: DocChange, type: DocChangeType) => void,
+  onSetupFailed: (error: unknown) => void,
+): Unsubscribe {
+  const nuri = toNuri(nuriLike, "subscribeDoc");
+  assertMayReach(nuri, "subscribeDoc");
+  return subscribeDocUnguarded(nuri, onChange, onSetupFailed);
+}
+
 /**
  * The unguarded core. Exported for ONE importer — `shared-wallet/physical.ts`, which
  * owns the machinery's entire privileged door — and for nobody else. It is not
@@ -300,6 +414,7 @@ export function subscribeDoc(
 export function subscribeDocUnguarded(
   nuri: Nuri,
   onChange: (r: DocChange, type: DocChangeType) => void,
+  onSetupFailed?: (error: unknown) => void,
 ): Unsubscribe {
   // Resolved here, synchronously, so calling this before `configure()` still throws at
   // the call rather than inside a background task nobody awaits.
@@ -311,7 +426,9 @@ export function subscribeDocUnguarded(
     fanOuts.set(nuri, entry);
   }
   const joined = entry;
-  joined.listeners.add(onChange);
+  // THIS call's subscription — see {@link DocListener} for why it is not the function.
+  const listener: DocListener = { onChange, onSetupFailed: onSetupFailed ?? null };
+  joined.listeners.add(listener);
 
   // Joining a document somebody else already opened: hand this listener the `State` its
   // own `doc_subscribe` would have pushed it. Asynchronously, like the real push, so a
@@ -319,8 +436,8 @@ export function subscribeDocUnguarded(
   if (joined.lastState) {
     const { resp, type } = joined.lastState;
     queueMicrotask(() => {
-      if (fanOuts.get(nuri) === joined && joined.listeners.has(onChange)) {
+      if (fanOuts.get(nuri) === joined && joined.listeners.has(listener)) {
-        deliver(nuri, onChange, resp, type);
+        deliver(nuri, listener, resp, type);
       }
     });
   }
@@ -334,7 +451,7 @@ export function subscribeDocUnguarded(
   return () => {
     if (stopped) return;
     stopped = true;
-    joined.listeners.delete(onChange);
+    joined.listeners.delete(listener);
     // The LAST one out releases the real subscription — while anybody is still
     // listening, tearing it down would silence them (and re-opening it later is not
     // free: a second `doc_subscribe` evicts whoever else has the branch by then).

packages/polyfill/test/continuous-inbox-observation.test.ts

@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ import { getCaps, setCurrentUser } from "../src/shared-wallet/bootstrap";
 import { resolveAccount, userInbox } from "../src/shared-wallet/account-registry";
 import { observationSettled } from "../src/emulated-verifier/inbox-observer";
 import { cancelScheduledInboxProcessing } from "../src/emulated-verifier/inbox-processor";
+import { connectedUser } from "../src/emulated-verifier/connect";
+import { setOpenTimeoutForTests } from "../src/emulated-verifier/open-repo";
 import { bootPage, forgetEverything, signIn, type FakeWallet, type Quad } from "./wallet-fake";
 import type { Nuri } from "../src/model/types";
 
@@ -268,6 +270,42 @@ describe("switching identity", () => {
     expect(await documentsGivenTo("alice")).toEqual([]);
   });
 
+  test("MID-DRAIN files nothing for the identity that arrives", async () => {
+    const { doc, inTransit } = await bobSharesWithAlice();
+    // Test-side inspection only: the address is used to recognise the read in flight, and
+    // is never handed to an actor.
+    const aliceInbox = await userInbox("alice", "protected");
+    await signIn("alice");
+
+    // The broker takes its time over the deposits read, and the page switches user INSIDE
+    // that window — a person clicking "sign in as Bob" while a push is being applied. The
+    // ownership guard has already passed by then; it ran at the start of the read.
+    const answering = fake.sparql_query.getMockImplementation()!;
+    let switched = false;
+    fake.sparql_query.mockImplementation(async (...args: unknown[]) => {
+      const answer = await answering(...args);
+      if (!switched && args[3] === aliceInbox && String(args[1]).includes(`${INBOX}:payload`)) {
+        switched = true;
+        setCurrentUser("bob");
+      }
+      return answer;
+    });
+
+    fake._deliver(inTransit);
+    await converge();
+
+    // Bob was GIVEN nothing. (His own cap on the document is not evidence either way — he
+    // made it; what would be evidence is a Link, and there must be none.) Filed here, the
+    // cap addressed to Alice becomes a capability Bob holds at his next sign-in, and its
+    // real recipient is left with nothing at all.
+    expect(await documentsGivenTo("bob")).toEqual([]);
+    // …and Alice has lost nothing: an inbox is not consumed by a drain that abandoned it,
+    // so what was deposited for her is still there when she is the one connected.
+    await signIn("alice");
+    await converge();
+    expect(getCaps().capForHolder("alice", doc)).toBeDefined();
+  });
+
   test("and Alice coming back finds the deposit still there to apply", async () => {
     const { doc, inTransit } = await bobSharesWithAlice();
     await signIn("alice");
@@ -315,6 +353,50 @@ describe("a deposit that cannot be applied", () => {
     expect(getCaps().capForHolder("alice", first.doc)).toBeDefined();
   });
 
+  test("because its inbox could not be WATCHED is reported, and attempted again", async () => {
+    const { doc, inTransit } = await bobSharesWithAlice();
+    const aliceInbox = await userInbox("alice", "protected");
+
+    // A repo that never pushes its initial `State` is what a refused subscription looks like
+    // from the bootstrap open's side, and it waits out its bounded fallback before giving up.
+    // Eight seconds of it, twice, is the production wait and not a unit test's.
+    setOpenTimeoutForTests(20);
+
+    // The broker will not open a channel on Alice's inbox. Everything else about her session
+    // works — which is the point: the only symptom of a watch that was never established is
+    // that shares stop arriving.
+    const opening = fake.doc_subscribe!.getMockImplementation()!;
+    let refusing = true;
+    fake.doc_subscribe!.mockImplementation(async (...args: unknown[]) => {
+      if (refusing && args[0] === aliceInbox) throw new Error(`RepoNotFound: ${String(args[0])}`);
+      return opening(...args);
+    });
+
+    const reported = await whileWatchingTheLog(async () => {
+      await signIn("alice");
+      await converge();
+    });
+
+    // Said out loud, in this package's own words and under the connected identity — not left
+    // as the absence of a push.
+    expect(reported.filter((l) => /could not be watched/.test(l)).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    expect(reported.find((l) => /could not be watched/.test(l))).toContain("[alice][polyfill]");
+
+    // Nothing is watching, so the deposit that lands now cannot be applied — and is not.
+    fake._deliver(inTransit);
+    await converge();
+    expect(getCaps().capForHolder("alice", doc)).toBeUndefined();
+
+    // The broker recovers and Alice does something ordinary. The inbox that could not be
+    // opened was not written off for the session: it is subscribed to on the next
+    // enumeration, and its initial push finds the deposit still waiting.
+    refusing = false;
+    await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
+    await converge();
+    expect(getCaps().capForHolder("alice", doc)).toBeDefined();
+    expect(await documentsGivenTo("alice")).toContain(doc);
+  });
+
   test("never rejects into the application — nobody asked for this work", async () => {
     const { inTransit } = await bobSharesWithAlice();
     const aliceInbox = await userInbox("alice", "protected");
@@ -338,3 +420,41 @@ describe("a deposit that cannot be applied", () => {
     expect(unhandled).toEqual([]);
   });
 });
+
+describe("a connection whose own work FAILED", () => {
+  test("still leaves the identity watched — being connected is what is observed", async () => {
+    const { doc, inTransit } = await bobSharesWithAlice();
+    // The broker cannot answer for one of Alice's own stores, so the RESTORE fails and the
+    // connection rejects. She is connected regardless: `setCurrentUser` is synchronous and
+    // took effect before any of this ran, and nothing signs her back out.
+    const store = (await resolveAccount("alice"))?.docPublic;
+    if (store === undefined) throw new Error("the fixture did not give Alice a public store");
+    fake._failReadsOn.add(store);
+
+    setCurrentUser("alice");
+    let rejected = false;
+    await whileWatchingTheLog(async () => {
+      try {
+        await connectedUser();
+      } catch {
+        rejected = true;
+      }
+      await converge();
+    });
+    // The caller is still TOLD, and that rule is not what changes here: failing to reach the
+    // registers rejects, exactly as before.
+    expect(rejected).toBe(true);
+
+    // The hiccup passes. Alice never touched the page.
+    fake._failReadsOn.delete(store);
+    fake._deliver(inTransit);
+    await converge();
+
+    // What she is owed is not the restore she lost — it is that a deposit made while she sits
+    // there converges. Watching used to be the LAST line of the connection work, so a restore
+    // that rejected skipped it and left her connected with nothing observing her inboxes: one
+    // hiccup at sign-in, and every share made afterwards was lost to her for the session.
+    expect(getCaps().capForHolder("alice", doc)).toBeDefined();
+    expect(await documentsGivenTo("alice")).toContain(doc);
+  });
+});

packages/polyfill/test/subscribe.test.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 import { test, expect, mock, afterAll } from "bun:test";
-import { docChangeType, subscribeDoc, subscribeDocs } from "../src/surface/subscribe";
+import {
+  docChangeType,
+  subscribeDoc,
+  subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure,
+  subscribeDocs,
+  type Unsubscribe,
+} from "../src/surface/subscribe";
 import { configure } from "../src/index";
 import { configureStoreRegistry } from "../src/shared-wallet/bootstrap";
 import { resetConfig, resetStoreRegistry } from "../src/shared-wallet/bootstrap";
@@ -225,3 +231,93 @@ test("the real subscription is released only when the LAST subscriber leaves", a
   stopSecond();
   expect(ng.isSubscribed(A)).toBe(false); // now nobody is
 });
+
+// --- what sharing one subscription must not COST a caller --------------------
+//
+// Three things a per-caller `doc_subscribe` gave for free. The fan-out took each of them
+// away when it was introduced, and each is invisible from the caller's side: nothing
+// rejects, nothing logs, the document simply stops speaking to somebody.
+
+test("two subscriptions with the SAME handler are two subscriptions", async () => {
+  const ng = inject();
+  const seen: unknown[] = [];
+  // One function, two callers. A module-level handler, a bound method or a shared arrow
+  // makes this ordinary rather than exotic — and keyed by the function, the second caller
+  // was never registered at all, so the first one's departure took it with it.
+  const handler = (r: unknown): void => {
+    seen.push(r);
+  };
+  const stopFirst = subscribeDoc(A, handler);
+  const stopSecond = subscribeDoc(A, handler);
+  await tick();
+  const afterInitial = seen.length;
+
+  stopFirst(); // only the FIRST caller has left
+  expect(ng.isSubscribed(A)).toBe(true);
+  ng.push(A);
+  expect(seen.length).toBeGreaterThan(afterInitial); // the second one is still listening
+
+  stopSecond();
+  expect(ng.isSubscribed(A)).toBe(false); // …and now the last one has gone
+});
+
+test("a subscriber torn down inside another's handler does not receive that push", async () => {
+  const ng = inject();
+  const seen: unknown[] = [];
+  let stopSecond: Unsubscribe | null = null;
+  let armed = false;
+  // The first handler tears the second one down mid-push. Which of the two runs first is an
+  // ordering no application controls, and `subscribeDoc` publishes that no `onChange` fires
+  // after unsubscribe — so the answer must not depend on it.
+  const stopFirst = subscribeDoc(A, () => {
+    if (armed) stopSecond?.();
+  });
+  stopSecond = subscribeDoc(A, (r) => seen.push(r));
+  await tick();
+  seen.length = 0;
+
+  armed = true;
+  ng.push(A);
+
+  expect(seen).toEqual([]);
+  stopFirst();
+});
+
+test("a setup that FAILED does not poison the document for the next subscriber", async () => {
+  const failFor = new Set([A]);
+  const ng = inject(failFor);
+  const stopFirst = subscribeDoc(A, () => {});
+  await tick();
+  expect(ng.doc_subscribe).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); // …and it rejected
+
+  // The document syncs; the broker can serve it now. A caller arriving after a transient
+  // rejection must get a real subscription, exactly as its own `doc_subscribe` would have.
+  failFor.delete(A);
+  const seen: unknown[] = [];
+  const stopSecond = subscribeDoc(A, (r) => seen.push(r));
+  await tick();
+
+  expect(ng.doc_subscribe).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); // attempted again, not joined to a corpse
+  expect(seen.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); // its initial State
+  ng.push(A);
+  expect(seen.length).toBeGreaterThan(1); // and the changes that follow
+  stopFirst();
+  stopSecond();
+});
+
+test("a caller that asks to be told learns its subscription could not be opened", async () => {
+  inject(new Set([A]));
+  const failures: unknown[] = [];
+  const stop = subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure(
+    A,
+    () => {},
+    (error) => failures.push(error),
+  );
+  await tick();
+  // Upstream `doc_subscribe` is async and rejects, so its caller learns. This wrapper
+  // returns synchronously, and a caller whose job depends on the subscription (the inbox
+  // observation) cannot otherwise tell "quiet" from "never opened".
+  expect(failures).toHaveLength(1);
+  expect(String(failures[0])).toContain("RepoNotFound");
+  stop();
+});