feat: la fuite du filtre de lecture devient la tache prioritaire

.tasks/todo/T01.p-four-minor-surface-faults.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+---
+id: T01.p
+title: Four minor faults on the published surface
+parent: T01
+depends_on: [T01.o]
+created: 2026-09-24
+claimed_by: null
+claimed_at: null
+blocked: false
+---
+
+## Description
+
+The four minor findings of T01.g, all CONFIRMED there. None is a rights or correctness defect; each is a published-surface or annotation inaccuracy. Verify each still stands before changing it - T01.o may have moved some.
+
+1. `Schema` and `DeepSignalSet` are published with no published signature using them, against the rule stated at `packages/polyfill/src/index.ts:78` (the same `ReadCap`/`InboxScope` rule, so this is a recurrence). Either a published signature uses them or they are unpublished.
+2. Seven symbols annotated `kind=invention level=none ref=none` sit ABOVE the polyfill-era divider, under the heading that promises a target counterpart for every symbol (`index.ts:45`, `:111-123`). Either the annotation is wrong or they are on the wrong side of the divider.
+3. `docChangeType` is published but absent from the concept contract's `## Surface`, and nothing pins that block against the actual exports. Add it, and consider whether the block should be pinned by a test the way the deletion list already is.
+4. `account-registry.ts:971` annotates `storeRegistry.resolveScopeGraph`, unpublished since `1.0.0-dev.5`. A provenance annotation on an unpublished symbol claims a surface that does not exist.
+
+**Hard gate:** `bun test` -> 0 fail; both typechecks exit 0; `python3 ~/.claude/skills/concept/lint.py` -> 0 ERROR. Anti-cheat as usual. Any symbol you unpublish is a MAJOR by the contract's own change policy - follow it rather than deciding the level yourself.
+
+## Progress
+
+## Result