docs: dire par situation ce qu'un appelant voit changer, pas les deux ensemble

Le texte disait que les deux situations passaient de `isSuccess` a
`isPending`. Verifie : seul le second `configure()` publiait un succes
(vide ou perime). Sur un refus tardif du courtier la lecture etait deja
retenue - ce qui change est la sortie, la nouvelle tentative se
re-souscrit au lieu d'etre bloquee pour la session.

.project/concepts/app-contract/knowledge_what-a-failed-read-answers-upstream.md

@@ -40,6 +40,6 @@ Three rules follow, and all three are load-bearing:
 2. **An empty document is a SUCCESS holding zero objects.** The repair for (1) must never be bought by making a real emptiness into an error; that only moves the lie. An empty document, an empty scope, a document nobody opened an inbox on, a document in a public store that exposes no key - each is an answer, and each stays one.
 3. **The unsynced/empty collision is closed by the barrier, and where the barrier was not crossed the read says so rather than answering.** Crossing it is what makes a zero-row answer mean something (`emulated-verifier/open-repo.ts`, which keeps `synced` and `timed-out` deliberately apart). A reactive read over documents it NAMES consults that distinction and stays PENDING when the barrier was not reached - "I have no authoritative answer" rather than "there is nothing". Turning it into a rejection would be inventing a third outcome the engine does not have, and answering a success would be the collapse this whole leaf is about.
 
-   **What an application can see of this, exactly.** `useShapeQuery` folds it into its own states, and that is the only published channel: a named scope whose barrier was not crossed does not reach `isSuccess`. That held only **within one ordinary session** until `1.0.0-dev.10`: a second `configure(...)` tore down the subscription layer without telling the open registry, and a broker refusing a subscription after this package had stopped waiting left the document recorded as open - in both, a document recorded as open was not, and the read answered an empty success. Closed by giving the question ONE answer: openness is the state of the document's one real subscription, read rather than remembered, so no record of it can outlive the channel it describes. The REACHABILITY half was never affected. `inbox.readSyncedForDocument` is the same guarantee on the inbox path. `getSyncState` is INTERNAL and is deliberately not published - this leaf offered it until 2026-09-24, which was a pointer at something no caller can import. It stays internal because it has no counterpart upstream at any level: publishing it would hand an application a polyfill-era symbol to unlearn at migration, on a surface that is busy removing exactly those. The consequence to state plainly rather than paper over: a caller using the anchored `docs.sparqlQuery` directly gets zero rows for an unsynced document and has **no published way to tell that from an empty one** - that is the collapse upstream has too, and it is why the reactive read is the one that carries the distinction.
+   **What an application can see of this, exactly.** `useShapeQuery` folds it into its own states, and that is the only published channel: a named scope whose barrier was not crossed does not reach `isSuccess`. That held only **within one ordinary session** until `1.0.0-dev.10`: a second `configure(...)` tore down the subscription layer without telling the open registry, and a broker refusing a subscription after this package had stopped waiting left the document recorded as open - in both, a document recorded as open was not; the first answered an empty or stale success, and the second left the read withheld with no way back, since the retry it invites was blocked by that record. Closed by giving the question ONE answer: openness is the state of the document's one real subscription, read rather than remembered, so no record of it can outlive the channel it describes. The REACHABILITY half was never affected. `inbox.readSyncedForDocument` is the same guarantee on the inbox path. `getSyncState` is INTERNAL and is deliberately not published - this leaf offered it until 2026-09-24, which was a pointer at something no caller can import. It stays internal because it has no counterpart upstream at any level: publishing it would hand an application a polyfill-era symbol to unlearn at migration, on a surface that is busy removing exactly those. The consequence to state plainly rather than paper over: a caller using the anchored `docs.sparqlQuery` directly gets zero rows for an unsynced document and has **no published way to tell that from an empty one** - that is the collapse upstream has too, and it is why the reactive read is the one that carries the distinction.
 
 Related: `knowledge_what-a-read-scope-is-upstream` (what a read request can SAY, including the `[]` that means the empty set and the `[]` that means no filtering), and `polyfill-surface/contract_polyfill-surface` `## Guarantees` for the caller-facing form of all of this.