---
id: T01.p
title: Four minor faults on the published surface
parent: T01
depends_on: [T01.o]
created: 2026-09-24
claimed_by: null
claimed_at: null
blocked: false
---

## Description

The four minor findings of T01.g, all CONFIRMED there. None is a rights or correctness defect; each is a published-surface or annotation inaccuracy. Verify each still stands before changing it - T01.o may have moved some.

1. `Schema` and `DeepSignalSet` are published with no published signature using them, against the rule stated at `packages/polyfill/src/index.ts:78` (the same `ReadCap`/`InboxScope` rule, so this is a recurrence). Either a published signature uses them or they are unpublished.
2. Seven symbols annotated `kind=invention level=none ref=none` sit ABOVE the polyfill-era divider, under the heading that promises a target counterpart for every symbol (`index.ts:45`, `:111-123`). Either the annotation is wrong or they are on the wrong side of the divider.
3. `docChangeType` is published but absent from the concept contract's `## Surface`, and nothing pins that block against the actual exports. Add it, and consider whether the block should be pinned by a test the way the deletion list already is.
4. `account-registry.ts:971` annotates `storeRegistry.resolveScopeGraph`, unpublished since `1.0.0-dev.5`. A provenance annotation on an unpublished symbol claims a surface that does not exist.

**Hard gate:** `bun test` -> 0 fail; both typechecks exit 0; `python3 ~/.claude/skills/concept/lint.py` -> 0 ERROR. Anti-cheat as usual. Any symbol you unpublish is a MAJOR by the contract's own change policy - follow it rather than deciding the level yourself.

## Progress

## Result