Align the polyfill's surface and docs with the verified NextGraph reality and
remove application-level concepts:
- Identity is an ID, not a username: AccountRecord.id, shim predicate shim:id,
normalizeId; accounts core becomes IdentityStore (set/clear/get) — the faux
login/logout framing is gone (identity is set at wallet-import time).
- Relationship/connection is an application concept, not a platform primitive
(NextGraph has no bilateral-connection primitive: grantee is unpersisted
scaffolding, cap-send is unimplemented). Remove connections.ts; caps exposes
only a directed grantRead(doc, granteeId) + a read-only protectedDocsOf(owner).
Delete the now-dead isolation.ts social-visibility axis.
- Inbox docs: NextGraph has no separate curator — the recipient's own verifier
unseals and applies each queued sealed message inline (process_inbox);
inbox_post_link is a proposed/future API. Stop attributing the emulated
curator to the platform.
- Read isolation reframed around the outcome: no cap -> empty union read;
targeted read of an unheld repo -> RepoNotFound; cap introspection
(canRead/governsRead) is emulation-only with no NextGraph API behind it.
- read-model.md corrected: the listing path is per-doc ANCHORED default-graph
queries, never the anchorless GRAPH ?g union (that is O(wallet)); the probe
section no longer claims the opposite.
- README recap table restructured (target | current NextGraph status | current
emulation); INDEX_ACCOUNT documented as reservedAccount("index") in the
sentinel namespace; de-domained generic-layer comments; softened tone.
Consumer application (Festipod) rewired separately to own the relationship
concept and feed the lib an id. Lib gates: bun test 83 pass / 0 fail, tsc clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.1 KiB
Fallback — forking NextGraph to expose the inbox (path not taken)
Status: not taken — short-circuited by this lib's emulated inbox
(inbox.ts, see simulation.md). Kept as the fallback plan if
a native broker inbox ever becomes necessary — chiefly for the crypto
anonymity the emulation does not provide (native from = None sealed deposit).
Current NextGraph does not expose the inbox to the JS SDK: the verifier has no
InboxPost arm and no wasm helper seals a deposit (see
nextgraph-current-state.md § Inbox). Two ways to
get a real inbox: emulate it (what this lib does) or fork the engine (this
document). The emulation was chosen; this is the archived alternative.
Strategic posture
The fork would be explicitly temporary, not for upstream. Hypothesis: NextGraph will eventually expose its own JS-SDK inbox solution, possibly different. When it lands, drop the fork and adapt. No PR is targeted. This posture is the reason the emulation was preferred: it avoids maintaining a fork + hosting a full stack for a feature the upstream will likely ship differently.
Layer 1 — the Rust patch: 4 files (vanilla broker)
engine/net/src/types.rs—InboxMsgContent::Linkis a unit variant (stub); give it a payload (or aNotificationvariant) carrying the target NURI + link to the deposited reference. Add anInboxPost::new_link(...)builder modeled onnew_contact_details.from = None→ anonymity.engine/verifier/src/request_processor.rs— add the missing command arm (there is noInboxPostarm). Ideally a high-level command (NotifyInbox) that builds the post on the Rust side (keeps crypto sealing in Rust). Model onSocialQueryStart.sdk/js/lib-wasm/src/lib.rs— exposepub async fn inbox_post_link( session_id, to_inbox_nuri, to_profile_nuri, link, anonymous), modeled onsocial_query_start.engine/verifier/src/inbox_processor.rs(process_inbox) — a receive arm where the owner's own verifier unseals the queued message and applies it inline into the owner's store (model on theContactDetailshandler). The app then reads via ORM/SPARQL — no new inbox-read API.
Identity resolution (known/anonymous): free via app-side SPARQL (JOIN the
sender inbox NURI against social:contact docs). Discovering the owner's
inbox: embed the owner's public_store inbox NURI in the entity document or
public profile (the QR profile-share flow already carries it).
Layer 2 — deployment (from the fork)
The patched verifier runs in the iframe ng-app (see integration model in
nextgraph-current-state.md) → build and
self-host ngd + the ng-app from the fork, then rebuild Festipod's @ng-org/web
with NG_REDIR_SERVER/NG_DEV* pointing at that ng-app. No rewrite of the
third-party integration (stays iframe). The broker's inbox routing is already
native, but since the patched ng-app is self-hosted, the whole stack ships from
the fork (one source tree).
Coolify hosting — 3 web pieces
ngd— stateful WebSocket daemon: container with a persistent volume for--base-path(RocksDB + keys + PeerId, never wiped),--domainmode behind Coolify's Traefik. Build: official Dockerfiles are broken → write a custom multi-stage Rust Dockerfile (RocksDB needs llvm/clang). First boot is interactive (admin-wallet invitation link) → script viangclior do it once by hand then persist in the volume.- ng-app (iframe frontend, patched wasm) — static build
(
pnpm webfilebuild). Served statically. - Routing: one domain serves the ng-app static AND proxies the WebSocket to
ngd.
Layer 1 (JS libs) — patched client npm packages
Maintain patched client packages, not just the wasm. The generic forwarding technically reaches a wasm method without touching the JS, but that's an untyped hack — quick test only. To modify for real:
@ng-org/web— modified anyway (broker URL) → addinbox_post_linkto the typed API surface +.d.ts.- Streamed methods (if inbox reads ever stream) — need an entry on both sides. For write-only (request/response) — unneeded.
@ng-org/orm— only if inbox writes join the ORM flow. Otherwise unneeded.
Layer 3 — consumer application integration
Exposing the method is not enough; the consumer application must model the entity +
its inbox NURI, write the registration, deposit into the host inbox, and read/resolve
notifications. Several of these are already done in the shared-wallet emulation
(registration wired on the emulated inbox.post), which is precisely why this fork
was not needed.
Why this fallback still matters
The emulated inbox stores from = null as absence of a triple; it does not seal
deposits, so it does not provide the target's crypto anonymity. If a consumer
application needs true anonymous-but-verifiable deposits to a non-connected host,
only a native inbox (from = None sealed) delivers it — and this fork is the route.
Until then, the emulation is sufficient.