ng-eventually/packages/sdk

@ng-eventually/sdk

One entry point. Most of what it publishes has the same signature as the future SDK — ng, useShape, watchShape, docs, inbox, storeRegistry, readUnion (+ types) — and is a drop-in for @ng-org/web / @ng-org/orm: as NextGraph matures it resolves to the real SDK (build alias removed) with no code change.

Four calls do not, and they are the whole of what you will delete: configure, configureStoreRegistry, setCurrentUser, connectedUser. They exist because one shared wallet hosts every user; upstream, an application imports the SDK and each user opens their own wallet. src/index.ts groups them under a heading that says so.

(There were two entry points until 2026-08-07, . and ./polyfill, and the second one WAS that list. One door is easier to import from and says less — hence the grouping, and hence docs/api-contract.md, whose export inventory a test keeps honest.)

Per-symbol, with the target signature and an epistemic label on every claim: docs/api-contract.md.

Reading is key possession, and the isolation here is still fake. The cap surface has the shape of the real model — you hold a document's ReadCap or you do not read it, and there is no authorization list anywhere — but nothing is encrypted yet and the stand-in key is a constant. Nothing this library does may be described as "anonymous" or "private" until per-document encryption lands (P1b).

import {
  // SDK-shaped — the real SDK replaces these in place.
  ensureIdentity, storeRegistry, inbox, readUnion, docs,
  // Polyfill-era — these go away, and they are the whole of what goes away.
  configure, configureStoreRegistry, setCurrentUser,
} from "@ng-eventually/sdk";

configure({ ng: realNg, useShape: realUseShape, sharedWallet });
configureStoreRegistry({ getSession });
await ensureIdentity();                                  // who am I (shared wallet)
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc(me, "protected");
await docs.sparqlUpdate(sid, `INSERT DATA { … }`, doc);
const subjects = await readUnion(await storeRegistry.listMyEntityDocs(me, "protected"));

Principle — the polyfill compensates, it never extends

Its only reason to exist is to bridge a NextGraph implementation gap. Every non-SDK surface must map to something NextGraph will provide natively, and must fall away at that point — no bespoke features, no observability, no convenience API that isn't strictly "NextGraph will do this later". The test for any proposed addition: does it compensate a real, exhibited gap? If not, it belongs in the consumer application. And a compensation whose gap is not actually exhibited on the target broker is dead weight, not defensive code.

Both halves are binding — the surface AND the implementation stay as close as possible to what NextGraph plans. The question to ask at every choice: would this make a caller learn something it has to UNLEARN at migration? If yes, it is a deviation, whatever it buys.

What the polyfill adds, each emulated now and native later:

• Shared-wallet identity — one wallet hosts every user, so the library fabricates virtual users and confines every access to the connected one (emulated-verifier/reach.ts). Upstream, each user opens their own wallet.
• Capability emulation — per-identity cap possession plus a read filter over it: you read the documents whose cap you hold. There is no authorization list, because the real model has none.
• Inbox — post, postToDocument, share, and the recipient's processing. The model is verified (an inbox is a keypair on one repo); no JS surface exists yet.

Generic by construction: no application domain here. See examples/notebook for an application written against it, which the e2e suite drives.

How a document is reached — the three acts, and no others

import { storeRegistry, inbox, readUnion } from "@ng-eventually/sdk";

// 1. CREATE — you hold its cap, with nothing to declare.
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc(me, "protected");

// 2. GIVE TO READ — name the document and the person. The key is looked up and
//    sealed into a deposit; the recipient applies it by connecting, with nothing
//    to call. Irreversible: there is no revoking a key already handed out.
await inbox.share(doc, "bob");

// 3. CIRCULATE THE REFERENCE — no call at all. Every reference this surface returns
//    is BARE: it names the document and grants nothing. If the document sits in a
//    PUBLIC store, the store serves its read cap to whoever asks, so the bare
//    reference is enough to read it — and if it does not, the reference still names
//    it and opens nothing.
const publicDoc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc(me, "public");
// …put `publicDoc` in a QR code, a message, another document. Nothing else to do.
await readUnion([publicDoc]);   // a stranger holding only this reads it

The invariant behind all three: you never derive a cap from a bare reference. You look it up in what you hold, you were given it, or a public store served it. A did:ng:o:… without :r: names a document and opens nothing — which is what makes confidentiality composable: a widely circulated document may point at a restricted one, and following the reference gets you a name, not a key. See docs/readcap-and-nuri-model.md § 0.

The types carry that invariant

Nuri and ReadCap are template literal types, not string aliases:

type Nuri    = `did:ng:${string}`
type ReadCap = `did:ng:${string}:r:${string}`

They are still strings — assignable to string, JSON-serializable, no wrapper — but the distinction is checked. A ReadCap goes wherever a Nuri is expected (a cap is a NURI with the key inside); the reverse does not compile.

Permissive in, precise out. Public entries take NuriLike (Nuri | string) and validate at the door, so a value coming from storage, a URL or a form needs no narrowing and no cast on your side; what they return is a precise Nuri. The runtime checks stay regardless — a JavaScript caller never meets the compiler.

const saved = localStorage.getItem("doc");        // string | null
if (saved) await readUnion([saved]);              // ✓ validated at the door