d8c36bac3b
Observability probe for the shared-wallet isolation footgun: on one physical
wallet several virtual identities coexist, and a read must never surface a doc
scoped to another identity. When it does (B reading A's doc), the leak is
invisible in the data — it looks like a normal read. This makes it VISIBLE.
Every real read/write is logged, prefixed by the ACTIVE virtual identity
(getCurrentUser → the account the op is scoped under, NOT the constant shared
physical wallet id). Reads append the row count — a strong leak signal:
[urn:festipod:user:bob] READ did:ng:o:docA (readDoc) → 3 rows
Instrumented at the LOW common point in docs.ts: every read routes through
sparqlQuery, every write through sparqlUpdate, container creation through
docCreate. Callers pass a semantic label (readDoc|readUnion|listMyEntityDocs|
writeEntity|deposit|…) that is a lib-internal probe param, NOT forwarded to the
real `ng` (preserves docs.test.ts exact-forwarding assertions).
OFF by default → one boolean read on the hot path, zero output. On via
configure({ debugAccessLog: true }) or env NG_EVENTUALLY_ACCESS_LOG=1 (no code
change). Polyfill-era; removed at the real multi-store migration.
tsc --noEmit: 0 errors. bun test: 91 pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ng-eventually/client
Two entry points — the data-plane is SDK-identical, the polyfill bootstrap is separate:
| Import | Surface |
|---|---|
@ng-eventually/client |
The same signature as the SDK — ng, useShape, inbox (+ types). A drop-in for @ng-org/web / @ng-org/orm; as NextGraph matures it resolves to the real SDK (build alias removed) with no code change. |
@ng-eventually/client/polyfill |
The only non-SDK surface — configure, setCurrentUser, and capability helpers (getCaps, grantRead, canRead/canWrite). It falls away as NextGraph matures. |
// bootstrap (the only non-SDK call) — inject the real SDK
import { configure } from "@ng-eventually/client/polyfill";
configure({ ng: realNg, useShape: realUseShape, sharedWallet, currentUser });
// from here on, a pure SDK surface:
import { ng, useShape, inbox } from "@ng-eventually/client";
await ng.doc_create(/* … */);
const set = useShape(MyShape, scope); // filtered to what the identity may read
await inbox.post(targetInbox, ref); // deposit (anticipated SDK API)
What the polyfill adds on top of the real SDK (each emulated for now, native as NextGraph matures):
- Shared-wallet identity (one wallet for everyone; the current identity id is relayed to the SDK).
- Capability enforcement — a read filter + write guard over emulated grants attached to documents; the app declares a document's read policy and issues directed read grants.
- Anticipated methods (inbox
post, capability ops) with their future-SDK shapes, emulated for now.
Generic: no application domain. The consumer application injects its shapes and performs the acts of granting access. The relationship concept ("who is connected to whom") is the consumer application's own — the client exposes only directed per-document read grants.