475 lines
25 KiB
TypeScript
475 lines
25 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* While an identity is connected, its inboxes are WATCHED and what arrives is APPLIED.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── The regime this restores, and the one it replaces ─────────────────────
|
|
* Upstream, applying an inbox is not something that happens at connection — it is what a
|
|
* session DOES. A sealed message reaches the recipient's own verifier as it arrives
|
|
* (`LocalBrokerMessage::Inbox` → `session.verifier.inbox(msg, from_queue)`,
|
|
* `sdk/rust/src/local_broker.rs`), which unseals it and applies it inline
|
|
* (`engine/verifier/src/inbox_processor.rs`); `from_queue` distinguishes the backlog handed
|
|
* over at connection from the messages that follow, and BOTH go through the same door. So
|
|
* the backlog is the special case, and the continuity is the rule.
|
|
*
|
|
* This package had emulated only the backlog. `inbox.processInbox` was called from exactly
|
|
* one place — `connect.connectedUser`, at connection — and nothing anywhere applied a
|
|
* deposit after that. A share deposited into an inbox whose owner was sitting connected in
|
|
* front of it converged only when that person reloaded the page, and the deposit's own
|
|
* session covered the gap by usurping the owner's identity on a twenty-second timer
|
|
* (`emulated-verifier/inbox-processor.ts`) — which does nothing at all if the depositor
|
|
* closes their tab, and tells the connected owner nothing either way.
|
|
*
|
|
* So: for as long as an identity is connected, every inbox it may read is subscribed to,
|
|
* and every push over one of them applies what is in it.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── Watching is not applying ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
* `inbox.watch` looks like this and is not: it NOTIFIES an application that made a call and
|
|
* named one inbox. Its read does absorb the caps it passes over into memory for the session
|
|
* — that much is unavoidable, reading is what surfaces them — but it FILES nothing durably,
|
|
* which only `processInbox` does. This applies, on the whole set, without anybody asking —
|
|
* because processing an inbox is the library's job and not the app's, which is the same
|
|
* ruling `connect.ts` opens with.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── Subscription, never a poll ────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
* Every half is push-driven. The inboxes themselves are subscribed to individually. WHICH
|
|
* inboxes exist is itself a subscription, on two channels that do not overlap:
|
|
*
|
|
* - the REGISTER — an inbox opened mid-session appends an `AddInboxCap` record to the
|
|
* User branch of the private store (`branch-registers.openDocumentInbox`), so a push on
|
|
* that document re-enumerates `myInboxes()`;
|
|
* - WHAT THIS IDENTITY HOLDS (`CapRegistry.onChange`) — the same signal `watchShape`
|
|
* re-reads on. It answers the case the register cannot: an identity that connects
|
|
* before it has an account at all. Provisioning is lazy here, so a person's FIRST visit
|
|
* connects with no stores, no private store to follow and no inbox to watch; the
|
|
* account appears later, the moment the application creates anything, and filing its
|
|
* caps is what says so. Without this channel a brand-new user was watched from their
|
|
* SECOND visit onwards — which is exactly the person most likely to be sent something.
|
|
*
|
|
* So a document whose inbox this identity opened five minutes into the session is watched
|
|
* like the rest, and so is the very first inbox of a person who had none when they arrived.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── It belongs to ONE holder, and stops when that holder does ─────────────
|
|
* Everything below resolves the CURRENT holder when it runs — `myInboxes`, `processInbox`
|
|
* and everything under them ask `getCurrentUser()` at the moment they execute. So an
|
|
* observation started for Alice must not still be firing when Bob is connected: it would
|
|
* read Alice's registers under Bob, or file Alice's capabilities into Bob's ring. The
|
|
* observation is therefore stamped with its holder, every step re-checks it, and switching
|
|
* identity (or disconnecting) tears it down — the same rule, and the same reason,
|
|
* `connect.connectedUser` carries `stillConnected()` for.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { getCaps, getCurrentUser } from "../shared-wallet/bootstrap";
|
|
import { accessLogPrefix, logStage, shortNuri } from "../shared-wallet/access-log";
|
|
import { enumerateMyInboxes, type InboxEnumeration, type InboxRegister } from "./branch-registers";
|
|
import { drainInboxSerially, drainsSettled } from "./inbox-drain";
|
|
import { lookupAccount } from "../shared-wallet/account-registry";
|
|
import { processInbox } from "../surface/inbox";
|
|
import { subscribeDoc, subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure, type Unsubscribe } from "../surface/subscribe";
|
|
import type { Nuri, PrincipalId } from "../model/types";
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* One identity's live observation. Held whole rather than as loose module variables so
|
|
* that a step started under it can ask "am I still the current one" by IDENTITY of the
|
|
* object, not by comparing a name that a re-connection may have restored in between.
|
|
*/
|
|
interface Observation {
|
|
/** WHO this observation belongs to. Every step re-checks it before acting. */
|
|
holder: PrincipalId;
|
|
/** One subscription per inbox observed, keyed by it. */
|
|
inboxes: Map<Nuri, Unsubscribe>;
|
|
/** The subscription on the register that says WHICH inboxes exist. */
|
|
register: Unsubscribe | null;
|
|
/** Unsubscribe from the held-caps change signal — the second "which inboxes" channel. */
|
|
holdings: Unsubscribe | null;
|
|
/** True while a re-enumeration is running, so its own effects do not restart it. */
|
|
enumerating: boolean;
|
|
/** A trigger that arrived mid-cycle: the running one repeats once rather than lose it. */
|
|
enumerateAgain: boolean;
|
|
/**
|
|
* WHICH shortfall was reported last, or `null` when the last list came back WHOLE — so a
|
|
* register that stays unreadable is reported once, not once per cycle.
|
|
*
|
|
* Every signal this observation listens to runs a full cycle, and a persistent shortfall
|
|
* is re-read by each of them, so the condition is reported as many times as the identity
|
|
* is nudged: one deposit produced three copies of the same line. That is what buries the
|
|
* report that matters under the report that repeats. Cleared the moment a list comes back
|
|
* WHOLE, so a shortfall that goes away and returns is a new occurrence and says so.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── The register, and not a bare "already said something" ─────────────────
|
|
* There are TWO shortfalls, they are disjoint, and one is far worse than the other: the
|
|
* account record failing leaves this identity with NOTHING watched, its own two inboxes
|
|
* included, while the User branch failing leaves those two watched and only the
|
|
* per-document inboxes missing ({@link InboxEnumeration.incomplete}). A boolean here made
|
|
* the second silence the first — the condition CHANGED, to a materially different one, and
|
|
* the log said nothing because something had already been said. Keyed by register, a
|
|
* change of shortfall is what it is: news.
|
|
*/
|
|
shortfallReported: InboxRegister | null;
|
|
/** Enumerations and applications in flight — what {@link observationSettled} waits on. */
|
|
pending: Set<Promise<void>>;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let observation: Observation | null = null;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Where a failure to WATCH goes — distinct from a failure to APPLY, which
|
|
* `inbox-drain.ts` reports.
|
|
*
|
|
* Not a rejection: nothing awaits this work, exactly as at connection. And not silence, for
|
|
* the same reason as everywhere else in this package — an observation that cannot be
|
|
* established leaves deposits unapplied for the whole session, and the only thing a person
|
|
* would notice is that a share never arrives.
|
|
*/
|
|
function reportUnobserved(what: string, error: unknown): void {
|
|
console.error(
|
|
accessLogPrefix() + " connected, but " + what + " — deposits made from now on may not be " +
|
|
"applied until the next connection:",
|
|
error,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* What a shortfall on `register` leaves unwatched, in the words the log uses.
|
|
*
|
|
* The two lines have to READ differently, not merely be counted differently: a reader who
|
|
* sees the second one after the first has to be able to tell that the condition changed, and
|
|
* two identical sentences make an escalation look like a repeat. Both keep the phrase the
|
|
* report has always ended on, because it is the one thing this line is scanned for.
|
|
*/
|
|
function shortfallSaid(register: InboxRegister): string {
|
|
return register === "account-record"
|
|
? "the inboxes to watch could not all be listed (the account record — your own two " +
|
|
"inboxes, where a share addressed to you by name lands, are NOT among the ones watched)"
|
|
: "the inboxes to watch could not all be listed (the register of the inboxes opened on " +
|
|
"documents — your own two are watched)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Is `obs` still the live observation, for the identity it belongs to? */
|
|
function current(obs: Observation): boolean {
|
|
return observation === obs && getCurrentUser() === obs.holder;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Track a piece of in-flight work so {@link observationSettled} can wait for it. */
|
|
function track(obs: Observation, work: Promise<void>): void {
|
|
obs.pending.add(work);
|
|
void work.finally(() => obs.pending.delete(work));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Apply whatever is in `inbox`, for the holder this observation belongs to.
|
|
*
|
|
* Through the shared per-inbox queue, so this cannot interleave with a drain the deferred
|
|
* timer started on the same inbox (nor with another push of its own): two passes over one
|
|
* queue apply the same records twice. A failure is reported there and stops nothing — the
|
|
* next push over this inbox tries again, and the other inboxes were never involved.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function applyWhatArrived(obs: Observation, inbox: Nuri): Promise<void> {
|
|
if (!current(obs)) return;
|
|
await drainInboxSerially(inbox, async () => {
|
|
// Re-checked INSIDE the queue: this run may have waited behind another one, and the
|
|
// identity can have moved while it waited. Running it for the wrong holder is not a
|
|
// near-miss — it reads someone else's registers and files into someone else's ring.
|
|
//
|
|
// This check is NECESSARY and it is not SUFFICIENT, and until 2026-08-17 this comment
|
|
// claimed it was. It cannot be: the identity can move after it passes, while
|
|
// `processInbox` is mid-read. The claim was that `processInbox` "resolves the holder at
|
|
// each step, so the new holder is refused an inbox that is not theirs somewhere in the
|
|
// middle" — but its ownership guard runs ONCE, at entry, and a switch after that reached
|
|
// the filing with nobody left to refuse it. What it filed was the previous holder's cap,
|
|
// into the new holder's ring, durably. The guard that makes this run safe is therefore
|
|
// the one INSIDE `processInbox`, which captures the holder its guard authorised; this one
|
|
// only spares the work when the switch is already visible.
|
|
if (!current(obs)) return;
|
|
try {
|
|
await processInbox(inbox);
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
// An identity that moved MID-DRAIN can throw here too — the switch may land before
|
|
// `processInbox`'s own ownership guard, which then refuses the new holder an inbox that
|
|
// is not theirs. (Landing after it, the run ABANDONS quietly instead and returns; both
|
|
// leave the deposit where it is.) Abandoning is what this package has always called
|
|
// "not a failure", and reporting it would put a broker-looking error in the log every
|
|
// time a page switches user. Nothing is lost: abandoning happens BEFORE the deposit it
|
|
// stopped at is taken out of the queue (`emulated-verifier/inbox-consume.ts` asks
|
|
// whether the holder still stands, then pops), so that deposit and every one behind it
|
|
// are still there for its owner's next connection. What had already been popped was
|
|
// applied for the holder that was authorised at the time. Same rule, same words, as the
|
|
// drain loop in `connect.connectedUser`.
|
|
if (!current(obs)) return;
|
|
throw error;
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* (Re-)enumerate the inboxes this identity may read and subscribe to the ones not yet
|
|
* watched. Idempotent: an inbox already observed is left alone, so a re-enumeration costs
|
|
* one read and nothing else.
|
|
*
|
|
* Never removes: the list only grows within a session (an `AddInboxCap` record is durable),
|
|
* and dropping a subscription on a guess would silently stop applying an inbox.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── A list that came back SHORT still gets watched ────────────────────────
|
|
* `enumerateMyInboxes` and not `myInboxes`: the list is read from two independent registers
|
|
* and one of them being unreachable used to discard the other's answer too, so a broker
|
|
* hiccup spanning sign-in left the identity connected with ZERO inboxes watched rather than
|
|
* with one register's worth missing. Whatever came back is watched here and now — including,
|
|
* crucially, the user's own two inboxes, which are where a share addressed to a PERSON
|
|
* lands, and therefore the channel by which a read-only identity converges at all.
|
|
*
|
|
* The shortfall is reported, never passed over: an incomplete list is not a complete one,
|
|
* and the inboxes it is missing are watched on the next enumeration — which is what the
|
|
* register push and the holdings signal are for. Applying what lands in a user inbox is
|
|
* itself one of those signals (it files a cap), so the ordinary case repairs itself.
|
|
*
|
|
* Once per OCCURRENCE, though, not once per enumeration — see
|
|
* {@link Observation.shortfallReported}. The retry that repairs it is also what re-reads it,
|
|
* so a condition that persists is re-discovered by every signal; reporting each discovery
|
|
* says "it happened again" about the single thing that never stopped happening. An
|
|
* occurrence is per REGISTER, because the two shortfalls are two conditions: the list going
|
|
* from "missing the document inboxes" to "missing your own two" is not the same fault
|
|
* continuing, it is a worse one starting.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function watchTheInboxes(obs: Observation): Promise<void> {
|
|
if (!current(obs)) return;
|
|
let listed: InboxEnumeration;
|
|
try {
|
|
listed = await enumerateMyInboxes();
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
// Not knowing WHICH inboxes exist AT ALL is the whole observation failing, not one queue.
|
|
reportUnobserved("the inboxes to watch could not be listed", error);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!current(obs)) return;
|
|
if (listed.incomplete === null) {
|
|
obs.shortfallReported = null;
|
|
} else if (obs.shortfallReported !== listed.incomplete.register) {
|
|
obs.shortfallReported = listed.incomplete.register;
|
|
reportUnobserved(shortfallSaid(listed.incomplete.register), listed.incomplete.error);
|
|
}
|
|
for (const inbox of listed.inboxes) {
|
|
if (obs.inboxes.has(inbox)) continue;
|
|
try {
|
|
// The push is the signal; the drain is the work. The FIRST push is the initial
|
|
// `State`, which drains an inbox connection has usually just drained — idempotent,
|
|
// and the alternative (skip the first) would lose a deposit that landed in the gap
|
|
// between the two.
|
|
//
|
|
// The failure channel is not decoration: `subscribeDoc` returns SYNCHRONOUSLY and its
|
|
// one real `doc_subscribe` is opened afterwards, so a rejection there reaches nobody.
|
|
// Without it, this map held an entry for an inbox that was never watched, the loop
|
|
// above skipped it at every later enumeration, and the only observable difference from
|
|
// a healthy session was that shares stopped arriving.
|
|
obs.inboxes.set(
|
|
inbox,
|
|
subscribeDocReportingSetupFailure(
|
|
inbox,
|
|
() => track(obs, applyWhatArrived(obs, inbox)),
|
|
(error) => watchFailed(obs, inbox, error),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
logStage("OBSERVING " + shortNuri(inbox) + " for " + obs.holder);
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
reportUnobserved("this inbox could not be watched: " + shortNuri(inbox), error);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The subscription on `inbox` could not be OPENED — report it, and forget it.
|
|
*
|
|
* **Forget it**, because the entry this observation holds is the whole record of "already
|
|
* watched": leaving a dead one in place is how one rejection at connection turned into a
|
|
* session-long silence. Removed, the next enumeration subscribes again as if it had never
|
|
* been attempted.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── And that is ALL it does: recovery waits for the next SIGNAL ───────────
|
|
* Until 2026-08-17 this also re-enumerated on the spot, once per inbox. That call runs
|
|
* synchronously out of the very rejection it is reacting to, so it asks the broker that has
|
|
* just refused, in the same turn, with nothing having changed — and spends the one extra
|
|
* attempt it was allowed doing it. Deleting it left the whole suite green, which is the
|
|
* measure of what it achieved.
|
|
*
|
|
* What actually repairs this is an event, and this module already listens to the two that
|
|
* exist: the register push (`watchTheRegister`) and the held-caps signal
|
|
* (`CapRegistry.onChange`), each of which re-enters {@link enumerate} and finds this inbox
|
|
* unwatched. Applying anything at all fires the second one, so a session that is doing
|
|
* something catches up on its own. A session that is doing nothing waits for its next
|
|
* connection — where an unapplied deposit has always waited, since an inbox is not consumed
|
|
* by being unread. Polling for it is ruled out here for the same reason it is in
|
|
* `inbox-processor.ts`: this regime is push-driven, and a timer is what it replaced.
|
|
*/
|
|
function watchFailed(obs: Observation, inbox: Nuri, error: unknown): void {
|
|
if (!current(obs)) return;
|
|
const stale = obs.inboxes.get(inbox);
|
|
obs.inboxes.delete(inbox);
|
|
if (stale) {
|
|
try {
|
|
stale();
|
|
} catch (thrown) {
|
|
console.error(accessLogPrefix() + " releasing a failed inbox observation failed:", thrown);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
reportUnobserved("this inbox could not be watched: " + shortNuri(inbox), error);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Follow the register that says which inboxes exist, so one opened MID-SESSION is picked
|
|
* up. See the module header: `openDocumentInbox` appends its record to the User branch of
|
|
* the private store, and a same-session write pushes to its own subscribers.
|
|
*
|
|
* Idempotent, and RETRIED rather than given up on: an identity that connects before it has
|
|
* an account has no private store to follow yet, and acquires one the first time the
|
|
* application creates anything. Re-entered from the holdings signal, it catches up then.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function watchTheRegister(obs: Observation): Promise<void> {
|
|
if (!current(obs) || obs.register !== null) return;
|
|
let store: Nuri | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
// `lookupAccount`, not `resolveAccount`: the tolerant form answers `null` for a read
|
|
// that FAILED exactly as for one that found nothing, and the two could not mean more
|
|
// different things here — "this identity has no account yet" is a state to wait
|
|
// quietly through, "the broker did not answer" is a failure to report. The same
|
|
// distinction `connect.connectedUser` and `inbox.share` are built on.
|
|
store = (await lookupAccount(obs.holder))?.docPrivate;
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
reportUnobserved("the register of your inboxes could not be reached", error);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
// No account yet — nothing to follow, and asking for one would PROVISION it, which
|
|
// connecting deliberately does not do (`connect.connectedUser`). The holdings signal
|
|
// brings us back here the moment there is something to follow.
|
|
if (!store || !current(obs) || obs.register !== null) return;
|
|
try {
|
|
obs.register = subscribeDoc(store, () => track(obs, enumerate(obs)));
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
reportUnobserved("an inbox opened later in this session will not be watched", error);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The whole "which inboxes am I watching" cycle: catch up on the register, then on the
|
|
* inboxes. Both halves are idempotent, so this is what every trigger runs.
|
|
*
|
|
* A trigger that arrives while a cycle is running does not start a second one — the cycle
|
|
* FILES caps for the inboxes it lists (`myInboxes` → `fileOwnInbox`), which is one of the
|
|
* signals that runs it, so overlapping runs would pile up on their own effects. It is
|
|
* REMEMBERED instead of dropped: the running cycle repeats once more at the end, because a
|
|
* signal that arrived mid-cycle may be about something that cycle had already read past.
|
|
*
|
|
* That terminates rather than ping-ponging: filing a cap this identity already holds fires
|
|
* nothing (`caps.file` notifies only on a genuinely new one), so the repeat that finds
|
|
* nothing new sets no flag and the loop ends.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function enumerate(obs: Observation): Promise<void> {
|
|
if (!current(obs)) return;
|
|
if (obs.enumerating) {
|
|
obs.enumerateAgain = true;
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
obs.enumerating = true;
|
|
try {
|
|
do {
|
|
obs.enumerateAgain = false;
|
|
await watchTheRegister(obs);
|
|
await watchTheInboxes(obs);
|
|
} while (obs.enumerateAgain && current(obs));
|
|
} finally {
|
|
obs.enumerating = false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Start observing the connected identity's inboxes. Called at the end of the connection
|
|
* work (`connect.connectedUser`), and idempotent: calling it again for the identity already
|
|
* being observed changes nothing.
|
|
*
|
|
* ── It resolves when the WATCHING is in place, not when the applying is done ──
|
|
* Connecting publishes one guarantee — *the work it starts, it finishes* — and "your
|
|
* inboxes are now being watched" is part of that work, so this is awaited rather than
|
|
* fired. What it does NOT wait for is the applying: subscribing pushes an initial `State`,
|
|
* which drains each inbox again, and making a person's sign-in wait on a second pass over
|
|
* a backlog `connectedUser` has just applied would buy nothing.
|
|
*
|
|
* It never rejects. Failing to WATCH is reported where failures go and denies nobody their
|
|
* session — the same rule the drain loop above it follows, and for the same reason: what
|
|
* has not been DELIVERED stays in its queue for the next attempt. (Delivered, not applied:
|
|
* since 2026-08-26 a deposit is popped before its arm runs, so one whose arm then failed is
|
|
* gone — see `emulated-verifier/inbox-consume.ts`. Failing to WATCH takes nothing out.)
|
|
*/
|
|
// @provenance startObservingInboxes kind=aligned level=1 ref=engine/verifier/src/verifier.rs:inbox — upstream a connected verifier is handed each inbox message as it arrives and applies it; here the arrival signal is a document push, and the set of inboxes is the User branch's `AddInboxCap` records
|
|
export async function startObservingInboxes(): Promise<void> {
|
|
const holder = getCurrentUser();
|
|
if (holder === null) return;
|
|
if (observation !== null && observation.holder === holder) return;
|
|
stopObservingInboxes();
|
|
const obs: Observation = {
|
|
holder,
|
|
inboxes: new Map(),
|
|
register: null,
|
|
holdings: null,
|
|
enumerating: false,
|
|
enumerateAgain: false,
|
|
shortfallReported: null,
|
|
pending: new Set(),
|
|
};
|
|
observation = obs;
|
|
// The second "which inboxes exist" channel — see the module header. It is what makes a
|
|
// person's FIRST session watched at all: they connect holding nothing, and their account
|
|
// (with its inboxes) appears the moment the application creates something.
|
|
obs.holdings = getCaps().onChange(() => track(obs, enumerate(obs)));
|
|
const setup = enumerate(obs);
|
|
track(obs, setup);
|
|
await setup;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Stop observing — on an identity change, on disconnection, and when the library is
|
|
* un-configured.
|
|
*
|
|
* Work already inside the drain queue is not cancelled (nothing can un-issue a write
|
|
* already sent); it is neutralised instead, because every step re-checks that its
|
|
* observation is still the current one and returns rather than filing for the wrong holder.
|
|
*/
|
|
// @provenance stopObservingInboxes kind=aligned level=1 ref=engine/verifier/src/verifier.rs:Verifier — a verifier's inbox processing lives and dies with its session; switching identity is another session, so nothing of the previous one keeps applying
|
|
export function stopObservingInboxes(): void {
|
|
const obs = observation;
|
|
if (obs === null) return;
|
|
observation = null;
|
|
for (const unsub of obs.inboxes.values()) {
|
|
try {
|
|
unsub();
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
console.error(accessLogPrefix() + " stopping an inbox observation failed:", error);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
obs.inboxes.clear();
|
|
for (const unsub of [obs.register, obs.holdings]) {
|
|
if (!unsub) continue;
|
|
try {
|
|
unsub();
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
console.error(accessLogPrefix() + " stopping an inbox observation failed:", error);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
obs.register = null;
|
|
obs.holdings = null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Wait until the observation has nothing in flight — the enumerations it is running and the
|
|
* drains they started.
|
|
*
|
|
* A seam for a suite that has to observe convergence without waiting for it, in the same
|
|
* spirit as `runScheduledInboxProcessingNow`: it names no inbox and starts no work, so it
|
|
* can only wait for what a push has already caused. Never exported from the package.
|
|
*/
|
|
// @provenance observationSettled kind=invention level=none ref=none — a test seam over the observation; upstream nothing exposes "has the verifier finished applying"
|
|
export async function observationSettled(): Promise<void> {
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
const obs = observation;
|
|
const inFlight = obs ? [...obs.pending] : [];
|
|
if (inFlight.length === 0) break;
|
|
await Promise.all(inFlight);
|
|
}
|
|
await drainsSettled();
|
|
}
|