Retour sur l'adresse par défaut livrée en 8a382f2, qui faisait pointer tout
document vers l'inbox de son propriétaire. C'était acheter le coût au prix de
la forme — le mauvais arbitrage pour cette bibliothèque.
Vérifié en amont : le verifier route un message entrant par
`inboxes: PubKey → RepoId` (`engine/verifier/src/verifier.rs:1677,1928`) et le
déchiffre avec la moitié privée de CE repo. Et `InboxMsgBody`
(`engine/net/src/types.rs:4265`) ne porte aucun document cible — il n'en a pas
besoin : l'adresse EST l'identification. Une inbox appartient donc à exactement
un repo, et faire tenir plusieurs documents derrière une inbox émule une
relation que le modèle ne peut pas exprimer.
Conséquences :
- `createEntityDoc` ne publie plus rien. Un document neuf n'a pas d'inbox et
`documentInboxAddress` rend `undefined`.
- Une inbox s'ouvre par `openDocumentInbox(doc)`, sur décision du propriétaire.
C'est aussi ce qui règle le coût sans toucher à la forme : seuls les
documents destinés à RECEVOIR en paient une — l'app le sait, la bibliothèque
non.
- `inbox.postToDocument(doc, { payload })` : l'app nomme le DOCUMENT, jamais une
inbox. Lève quand le document n'en a pas, au lieu de rendre la main
silencieusement — un dépôt qui disparaît sans erreur est exactement le bug que
ce chemin traînait.
- Pas de champ « document cible » sur un dépôt. Ce serait une invention que les
apps devraient désapprendre à la migration.
README, principe de conception : les deux moitiés sont contraignantes, et c'est
la seconde qu'on brade. La surface doit être au plus près du futur SDK, mais
l'IMPLÉMENTATION aussi doit être au plus près de ce que NextGraph prévoit, sans
exception. Ce qui est connu vaut spécification. La pression à dévier ne se
présente jamais comme une déviation : elle arrive comme un coût, une latence,
une gêne d'ergonomie — bien réels. Deux cas déjà rencontrés sont consignés, avec
le signal commun : un choix qui ferait apprendre au consommateur quelque chose
qu'il devra DÉSAPPRENDRE.
157 tests unitaires, e2e 40/40 contre le broker en ligne.
Réécriture de « Apps & services » : la version précédente déduisait la forme
cible de l'absence d'implémentation dans le moteur — exactement ce que le
principe de conception du README interdit — et concluait l'inverse de ce que le
développeur NextGraph énonce.
Deux couches désormais séparées et étiquetées comme telles :
- ce que le moteur CONTIENT (vérifié) : `AppManifestV0` avec `singleton: bool`,
`access_requests`, `installs`, `dependencies` ; `init(callback, singleton,
access_requests)` côté JS. Et personne ne le consomme — le module
`permissions` n'est importé par aucune crate, `AppManifest` n'est construit
nulle part. Du vocabulaire, pas du comportement.
- ce que le modèle SERA (énoncé par le développeur, non implémenté) : une app
singleton peut aussi gérer les documents par utilisateur ; les données
communes prennent la forme d'un document ou d'un store partagé par tous les
utilisateurs et codé en dur dans l'app ; le développeur détient les droits
d'écriture et peut les déléguer, jamais à tous — les contributions arrivent
par une inbox.
Le commentaire du champ dit `/// cannot create Documents?`, avec le point
d'interrogation. Une seconde glose publiée le contredit et rejoint ce que dit
le développeur : `sdk/js/web/README.md:90,108` annote l'argument « will your app
create many docs in the system, or should it be launched as a unique instance »
— `singleton` porte sur la multiplicité d'instance, pas sur une interdiction de
créer des documents. C'est cette lecture qu'il faut retenir.
Conséquence sur l'ADR discovery : sa moitié « la voie app singleton est
incertaine » est caduque et doit être re-posée, sans que cela rétablisse la
découverte, qui tient sur son propre appui.
Fifteen findings, all verified before acting. The ones that mattered:
- Corrections added without updating what they corrected. §5's table still
said a cap-less NURI is one "without :k:", two hundred lines after §4
established the discriminant is `r:`. Same shape of defect in the P1a
report, which kept the sentence "it is the owner's keyring, upstream the
keyring is the wallet" — the exact sentence §4quater declares wrong, and the
one that produced a global in-memory keyring.
- A wrong source citation: RootCapRefresh/BranchCapRefresh live in
verifier/src/commits/mod.rs, not repo/src/commit.rs, and are no-op stubs.
- Documentation describing deleted code: isolation.ts, discovery.readIndex,
the global index, and an acceptance test that was dropped with discovery.
- The P1a implementation report had aged into being wrong in four places
(caps not persisted, inbox processing not started, plain string types, the
:k: segment). It is dated, so it now carries a header saying what later lots
overtook, rather than being rewritten.
- vision.md stated "a document's data is stored encrypted" in the present
tense. That is the target; here the cap value is the constant OK and nothing
is encrypted. Said plainly now.
- Prose left mangled by an earlier mechanical find-and-replace, in four places
I had claimed were repaired.
Also: reach.ts and connect.ts had no home in the permanent docs — the boundary
and the connection sequence are now described in simulation.md, not only in a
brief.
Two batches, verified against nextgraph-rs throughout.
P1a — the capability surface. Reading was an ACL (Map<doc, Set<principal>>),
the exact inversion of key possession. It is now possession: `capFor(nuri)` is
the only question, there is no principal parameter anywhere, and nothing turns
a bare reference into a cap. Sharing is `shareCap(cap, toInbox)`, a Link
deposit; receiving needs no operation. `Nuri` and `ReadCap` are template
literal types, so passing a bare reference where a cap belongs is a compile
error, with runtime guards behind it for JavaScript callers.
The virtual user boundary. Every access function is now confined to the
connected user, through two rules on one criterion (possession), implemented in
two places so a lapse in either is caught by the other: authorization at the
passage points, and "do not even attempt" at the callers. The polyfill's own
machinery moved to physical.ts — unguarded, never exported — which replaced an
exemption list: the machinery no longer gets waved through the guard, it calls
something the guard never saw.
Removed, as emulating capabilities the target does not have:
- discovery.ts and its global index. There is no discovery in NextGraph; you
follow links. It also pooled user data across wallets.
- the cross-account fan-out (listEntityDocs, resolveReadGraphs, allAccounts,
loadShim), which was cross-user enumeration by construction.
- resolveInboxAnchor, a single inbox common to every user.
Caps are now stored where NextGraph stores them, and read back rather than
recomputed: AddRepo on the store's Store branch for documents a user creates,
AddLink on its User branch for caps received. Inboxes belong to someone — the
user's own, plus one per document — and connecting a user drains them all;
that is the library's job, not the app's.
Corrections worth recording: a ReadCap is `r:`, not `:k:` (reported by
NextGraph's developer, verified in BlockRef::readcap_nuri); received caps DO
have a register (AddLink), contrary to what this repo's notes claimed; and
"wallet" upstream means keyring — what owns three stores is a user, so the
vocabulary follows.
The cap value is the constant OK: the only question the emulation answers is
whether a cap is held. P1b replaces that one constant with a real key.
After this the shape is right and the isolation is still fake. Nothing here may
be described as anonymous or private.
Align the polyfill's surface and docs with the verified NextGraph reality and
remove application-level concepts:
- Identity is an ID, not a username: AccountRecord.id, shim predicate shim:id,
normalizeId; accounts core becomes IdentityStore (set/clear/get) — the faux
login/logout framing is gone (identity is set at wallet-import time).
- Relationship/connection is an application concept, not a platform primitive
(NextGraph has no bilateral-connection primitive: grantee is unpersisted
scaffolding, cap-send is unimplemented). Remove connections.ts; caps exposes
only a directed grantRead(doc, granteeId) + a read-only protectedDocsOf(owner).
Delete the now-dead isolation.ts social-visibility axis.
- Inbox docs: NextGraph has no separate curator — the recipient's own verifier
unseals and applies each queued sealed message inline (process_inbox);
inbox_post_link is a proposed/future API. Stop attributing the emulated
curator to the platform.
- Read isolation reframed around the outcome: no cap -> empty union read;
targeted read of an unheld repo -> RepoNotFound; cap introspection
(canRead/governsRead) is emulation-only with no NextGraph API behind it.
- read-model.md corrected: the listing path is per-doc ANCHORED default-graph
queries, never the anchorless GRAPH ?g union (that is O(wallet)); the probe
section no longer claims the opposite.
- README recap table restructured (target | current NextGraph status | current
emulation); INDEX_ACCOUNT documented as reservedAccount("index") in the
sentinel namespace; de-domained generic-layer comments; softened tone.
Consumer application (Festipod) rewired separately to own the relationship
concept and feed the lib an id. Lib gates: bun test 83 pass / 0 fail, tsc clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
README: new section with a recap table (11 rows) — for each emulated behavior:
what the consumer sees (SDK-shaped API), how it's emulated on one shared wallet,
the real NextGraph target, and the lib-only migration. Makes "emulated ≠ real,
migration is a lib-only swap" explicit.
simulation.md: opening banner that EVERYTHING in the file is emulation pending
real NextGraph; corrected the stale read-path paragraph (per-doc anchored, never
an anchorless union-scan). read-model.md: reactivity bullet aligned to per-doc.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Source-verified against nextgraph-rs:
- nextgraph-current-state.md: NextGraph keeps ONE local oxigraph store per
session; each synced repo is a named graph. sparql_query with NO anchor
(UserSite/None) queries the UNION of all synced graphs (set_default_graph_as
_union); with an anchor it is restricted to one repo. Union is read-only
(updates need a doc anchor). No reactive SPARQL (one-shot). Root cause of the
ORM fan-out hang: orm_start_graph opens every graph in scope; a fresh/unsynced
per-entity doc → RepoNotFound aborts the subscription → the 75s never-fires.
- read-model.md (new): the read model — events via the global index (the one
enumeration hack); everything else by following a shared graph, opened/synced,
then listed via a single anchorless union sparql_query (never the ORM per-doc
fan-out); reactivity via re-query on a doc_subscribe/ORM change signal. Plus
the minimal broker probe to confirm the union behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This library presents a mature-NextGraph SDK face to consumers while
compensating for the current SDK's gaps via a shared-wallet simulation. It
therefore OWNS all current-state + simulation knowledge — moved here out of the
Festipod app repo, which must treat this library as a finished SDK.
New docs/:
- nextgraph-current-state.md — what the current SDK/broker do and don't expose
(5 store types, document=repo, per-document ReadCap, inbox not exposed, iframe
RPC proxy, mono-user/no-global-data, wallet import constraint). Keeps the
nextgraph-rs source pointers.
- simulation.md — how the lib emulates the mature behaviour on one shared wallet
(shim, store!=document two axes, docCreate→private store, RepoNotFound scope
rule, @ng-org double-proxy DataCloneError, emulated ReadCap/inbox/curator).
- decisions/ — the current-SDK ADRs (private-store-nuri-scope, sparql-delete,
shared-wallet-login, discovery mechanism).
- fork-inbox-fallback.md — the Rust-patch/self-host route not taken.
- migration-guide.md — the checklist for when real NextGraph matures.
README: boundary framing from the lib's side + docs/ index; replaced the stale
"scaffold/stubbed" status with the actually-implemented mechanisms per source.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Generic polyfill layer that makes a single NextGraph broker behave like the
not-yet-shipped multi-user NextGraph (emulated capabilities + inbox). Zero app domain.
@ng-eventually/client exposes an SDK-identical surface (ng, useShape, inbox); the
polyfill bootstrap (configure + capability helpers) is isolated under /polyfill, so
the main entry stays a drop-in for @ng-org/web|orm. The real SDK is injected at
configure() (no hard import → build-alias safe + testable).
Scaffold: NextGraph wiring stubbed with TODO; capability helpers implemented and
unit-tested (4 tests, typecheck clean). The global-index curator is deferred — in
NextGraph apps/services are mono-user with no global data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sylvain Duchesne