Files
Sylvain Duchesne 63ecfeeff8 docs+refactor(client): fidelity pass — id identity, drop connections, no faux-login, accurate NextGraph framing
Align the polyfill's surface and docs with the verified NextGraph reality and
remove application-level concepts:

- Identity is an ID, not a username: AccountRecord.id, shim predicate shim:id,
  normalizeId; accounts core becomes IdentityStore (set/clear/get) — the faux
  login/logout framing is gone (identity is set at wallet-import time).
- Relationship/connection is an application concept, not a platform primitive
  (NextGraph has no bilateral-connection primitive: grantee is unpersisted
  scaffolding, cap-send is unimplemented). Remove connections.ts; caps exposes
  only a directed grantRead(doc, granteeId) + a read-only protectedDocsOf(owner).
  Delete the now-dead isolation.ts social-visibility axis.
- Inbox docs: NextGraph has no separate curator — the recipient's own verifier
  unseals and applies each queued sealed message inline (process_inbox);
  inbox_post_link is a proposed/future API. Stop attributing the emulated
  curator to the platform.
- Read isolation reframed around the outcome: no cap -> empty union read;
  targeted read of an unheld repo -> RepoNotFound; cap introspection
  (canRead/governsRead) is emulation-only with no NextGraph API behind it.
- read-model.md corrected: the listing path is per-doc ANCHORED default-graph
  queries, never the anchorless GRAPH ?g union (that is O(wallet)); the probe
  section no longer claims the opposite.
- README recap table restructured (target | current NextGraph status | current
  emulation); INDEX_ACCOUNT documented as reservedAccount("index") in the
  sentinel namespace; de-domained generic-layer comments; softened tone.

Consumer application (Festipod) rewired separately to own the relationship
concept and feed the lib an id. Lib gates: bun test 83 pass / 0 fail, tsc clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 14:02:16 +02:00

95 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown

# ADR — Discovery mechanism (inbox-fed index, fan-out)
**Date:** 2026-06-16 · **Status:** mechanism accepted; target owner undecided.
Ported here for the discovery mechanism it defines — the piece this lib
realizes (`inbox.ts` post/materialize/watch; `store-registry.ts` fan-out). The
product intent (what a consumer application *should* surface) is the consumer
application's concern, not this lib's; only the mechanism is recorded here.
## Access is not discovery
- **Access**: may I read this document if I hold it? A public entity is
world-readable with its NURI.
- **Discovery**: how do I learn it exists, in order to read it? This is the ADR's topic.
## The mechanism
1. A single global index, fed via its inbox. The creator does not edit
the index directly: it deposits a reference into the index's inbox. The
index is an owned document (public read), built up from its inbox (a
watcher ingests deposits and adds entries).
2. Primary discovery is that global index.
3. Relational is a secondary axis, overlaid: a peer's participations,
markers on the global list. It rests on existing per-item data (protected scope),
with no new primitive.
## The 3-stage frame
`discovery → synchronization → query`
1. **Discovery**: the index gives the NURIs of the entity documents.
2. **Synchronization**: subscribe to those documents so they replicate locally
(verifier: `self.repos` + oxigraph dataset).
3. **Query**: query what is now local (sort, limit, reactivity). SPARQL/ORM
run on the local set only (`resolve_target_for_sparql` searches `self.repos`) —
you cannot query what is not loaded.
**Corollary:** a reactive query does not replace the index — it runs at stage 3 on
the local union that stages 1-2 built. You don't sync what you didn't discover.
## Why one reused mechanism
- **No Group store.** The index is not open-write: it is an owned document
(public read) plus a native inbox (a primitive present on every document). Nobody
writes the index but its owner (by ingesting inbox deposits). So the model
stays "3 stores + Dialog + inboxes, no Group store."
- **One mechanism, reused.** The inbox + ingest watcher serve both
submitting an entity to the index and a registration/deposit in one consumer
app — same `inbox.post` API, same handling. This is exactly `inbox.ts` in this
lib (`post` / `read` / `materialize` / `watch`).
- **Natural dedup / moderation point:** the inbox → index ingest is where
duplicates are detected / moderated before insertion.
## Index owner — target model undecided
NextGraph apps and services are mono-user with no global data
(see [`../nextgraph-current-state.md`](../nextgraph-current-state.md) § Apps &
services), so a dedicated service with its own wallet sharing a freely-readable
index is not a NextGraph shape. The only path glimpsed for a global document is a
singleton app bound to the developer-user — not implemented, uncertain, to explore
later. This is why a global-index package is a deferred separate package in this lib
(see the top-level README).
## Polyfill reality — the fan-out drift is now RESOLVED (special-account index)
The shared-wallet polyfill originally shipped a cross-account fan-out over
every account's public documents (`store-registry.ts` `listEntityDocs('public')`
/ `resolveReadGraphs`) — one account saw another's public entity without any
relationship to its creator. This ADR classified that per-account fan-out as a drift
to be replaced by the single global index.
That drift is now resolved in the polyfill. The inbox-fed global index of
this ADR is implemented on top of a reserved special account in the shim
(`discovery.ts`, `INDEX_ACCOUNT = reservedAccount("index")` — a sentinel-prefixed
key in the shim's reserved namespace that `normalizeId` can never produce, so it is
disjoint from any normalized user id, not the literal `"@index"`) that owns the
index document while
the target owner stays undecided: `submitToIndex(ref)` deposits into the index
document's inbox; `readIndex()` ingests (dedups) the entries. The app-facing
discovery path is now "read the index", exactly as this ADR prescribes — not
the fan-out. The cross-account fan-out survives only as an internal lib
fallback (it still powers per-scope listing like `resolveReadGraphs`), never
the discovery route. The special account is the provisional owner; at migration
it disappears and ownership moves to the decided global-index owner (see
[`../migration-guide.md`](../migration-guide.md)) with the consumer application's
surface (`submitToIndex` / `readIndex`) unchanged.
## Alternatives rejected (mechanism)
- **Open-write index** (creator writes the index directly): required a
collaborative document (Group store, SDK-blocked) and exposed the index to
corruption. Replaced by inbox deposit + owner-side ingest.
- **Purely relational discovery** (`social_query`): rejected as *primary* (a
global list is wanted); kept as a secondary axis.
- **No index, direct reactive query**: impossible — SPARQL is local-only (stage 3).