`readUnion` indexait par DOCUMENT une table nommée `bySubject`, créait ses entrées avec `subject: doc`, et jetait le sujet réellement lu après s'en être servi pour écarter la machinerie. Tout triplet non-machinerie d'un document tombait donc dans un sac unique étiqueté par la référence du document : deux entités écrites sous deux sujets revenaient **conflées**, une entité écrite sous un autre sujet revenait **ré-étiquetée**. Sans erreur, sans trace. **C'était une divergence, et c'est à ce titre qu'elle tombe.** NextGraph dit l'inverse aux deux niveaux : une requête ancrée résout le graphe du repo comme graphe par défaut et rend les sujets tels qu'ils sont ; et l'ORM porte sur chaque objet **deux** propriétés distinctes, `@id` et `@graph`, dont il FABRIQUE la première quand on la laisse vide (`graphIri + ":q:" + aléa`). Plusieurs objets par graphe est le cas prévu, et `@id` existe pour les distinguer à l'intérieur d'un `@graph`. La règle du projet reste **« un document séparé par entité métier »**, mais c'est une recommandation de placement dictée par le modèle de sécurité — une clé est par repo, donc l'isolation par entité exige un repo par entité. Ce n'est pas une contrainte que la lecture a le droit d'imposer en rendant l'autre disposition invisible. Le contrat porte désormais la recommandation, le code porte la capacité ; il faisait exactement l'inverse. **La justification de l'épinglage était une erreur de catégorie**, et elle a été retirée plutôt que contournée : `repo_graph_name` formate un nom de GRAPHE, il est estampillé sur les quads et aucun sujet n'est réécrit. Deux confirmations indépendantes, dont la suite e2e qui écrit un sujet puis le relit par correspondance exacte contre le vrai broker. `UnionSubject.subject` passe de `Nuri` à `string` — un sujet RDF réel est un IRI quelconque. `graph` reste `Nuri` et devient le champ à repasser au SDK ; l'app d'exemple l'utilise à ses deux sites, où le sens était « le document ». **Et la suite e2e ne comptait que les entrées.** C'est pour cela qu'elle est restée verte pendant tout le défaut : compter ne distingue pas un regroupement par document d'un regroupement par sujet. Elle écrit maintenant deux sujets dans le dernier document et vérifie les trois choses qui comptent — quatre entrées pour trois documents, chaque entrée portant le sujet sous lequel elle a été écrite, et son `graph` étant la référence du document. 202 tests unitaires (5 ajoutés, dont 3 échouent si l'on restaure l'ancien repliage), e2e 42/42 et applicatif 12/12.
@ng-eventually/sdk
One entry point. Most of what it publishes has the same signature as the future SDK —
ng, useShape, watchShape, docs, inbox, storeRegistry, readUnion (+ types) —
and is a drop-in for @ng-org/web / @ng-org/orm: as NextGraph matures it resolves to
the real SDK (build alias removed) with no code change.
One call does not, and it is the whole of what you will delete: configure. It
exists because one shared wallet hosts every user; upstream, an application imports the
SDK and each user opens their own wallet. src/index.ts groups it under a heading that
says so. (ensureIdentity is a second in substance — the shared-wallet gate — but its
call site survives: an application still awaits a session before it renders.)
(There were two entry points until 2026-08-07, . and ./polyfill, and the second one
WAS that list. One door is easier to import from and says less — hence the grouping, and
hence docs/api-contract.md, whose export inventory a test keeps honest.)
Per-symbol, with the target signature and an epistemic label on every claim:
docs/api-contract.md.
Reading is key possession, and the isolation here is still fake. The cap surface has the shape of the real model — you hold a document's
ReadCapor you do not read it, and there is no authorization list anywhere — but nothing is encrypted yet and the stand-in key is a constant. Nothing this library does may be described as "anonymous" or "private" until per-document encryption lands (P1b).
import {
// SDK-shaped — the real SDK replaces these in place.
ensureIdentity, storeRegistry, inbox, readUnion, docs,
// Polyfill-era — one call, and it is the whole of what goes away.
configure,
} from "@ng-eventually/sdk";
configure({ ng: realNg, useShape: realUseShape, getSession, sharedWallet });
await ensureIdentity(); // who I am (returned), connection work awaited
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
await docs.sparqlUpdate(sid, `INSERT DATA { … }`, doc);
const subjects = await readUnion(await storeRegistry.listMyEntityDocs("protected"));
Principle — the polyfill compensates, it never extends
Its only reason to exist is to bridge a NextGraph implementation gap. Every non-SDK surface must map to something NextGraph will provide natively, and must fall away at that point — no bespoke features, no observability, no convenience API that isn't strictly "NextGraph will do this later". The test for any proposed addition: does it compensate a real, exhibited gap? If not, it belongs in the consumer application. And a compensation whose gap is not actually exhibited on the target broker is dead weight, not defensive code.
Both halves are binding — the surface AND the implementation stay as close as possible to what NextGraph plans. The question to ask at every choice: would this make a caller learn something it has to UNLEARN at migration? If yes, it is a deviation, whatever it buys.
What the polyfill adds, each emulated now and native later:
- Shared-wallet identity — one wallet hosts every user, so the library fabricates
virtual users and confines every access to the connected one
(
emulated-verifier/reach.ts). Upstream, each user opens their own wallet. - Capability emulation — per-identity cap possession plus a read filter over it: you read the documents whose cap you hold. There is no authorization list, because the real model has none.
- Inbox —
post,postToDocument,share, and the recipient's processing. The model is verified (an inbox is a keypair on one repo); no JS surface exists yet.
Generic by construction: no application domain here. See
examples/notebook for an application written against it,
which the e2e suite drives.
How a document is reached — the three acts, and no others
import { storeRegistry, inbox, readUnion } from "@ng-eventually/sdk";
// 1. CREATE — you hold its cap, with nothing to declare. No identity parameter: a
// session belongs to one user, exactly as the target's own `doc_create` assumes.
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
// 2. GIVE TO READ — name the document and the person. The key is looked up and
// sealed into a deposit; the recipient applies it by connecting, with nothing
// to call. Irreversible: there is no revoking a key already handed out.
await inbox.share(doc, "bob");
// 3. CIRCULATE THE REFERENCE — no call at all. Every reference this surface returns
// is BARE: it names the document and grants nothing. If the document sits in a
// PUBLIC store, the store serves its read cap to whoever asks, so the bare
// reference is enough to read it — and if it does not, the reference still names
// it and opens nothing.
const publicDoc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("public");
// …put `publicDoc` in a QR code, a message, another document. Nothing else to do.
await readUnion([publicDoc]); // a stranger holding only this reads it
The invariant behind all three: you never derive a cap from a bare reference. You
look it up in what you hold, you were given it, or a public store served it. A
did:ng:o:… without :r: names a document and opens nothing — which is what makes
confidentiality composable: a widely circulated document may point at a restricted
one, and following the reference gets you a name, not a key. See
docs/readcap-and-nuri-model.md § 0.
The types carry that invariant
Nuri and ReadCap are template literal types, not string aliases:
type Nuri = `did:ng:${string}`
type ReadCap = `did:ng:${string}:r:${string}`
They are still strings — assignable to string, JSON-serializable, no wrapper — but
the distinction is checked. A ReadCap goes wherever a Nuri is expected (a cap is
a NURI with the key inside); the reverse does not compile.
Permissive in, precise out. Public entries take NuriLike (Nuri | string) and
validate at the door, so a value coming from storage, a URL or a form needs no
narrowing and no cast on your side; what they return is a precise Nuri. The
runtime checks stay regardless — a JavaScript caller never meets the compiler.
const saved = localStorage.getItem("doc"); // string | null
if (saved) await readUnion([saved]); // ✓ validated at the door