ng-eventually/.tasks/todo/T01.p-four-minor-surface-faults.md

id, title, parent, depends_on, created, claimed_by, claimed_at, blocked

id	title	parent	depends_on	created	claimed_by	claimed_at	blocked
T01.p	Four minor faults on the published surface	T01	T01.o	2026-09-24	null	null	false

Description

The four minor findings of T01.g, all CONFIRMED there. None is a rights or correctness defect; each is a published-surface or annotation inaccuracy. Verify each still stands before changing it - T01.o may have moved some.

1. Schema and DeepSignalSet are published with no published signature using them, against the rule stated at packages/polyfill/src/index.ts:78 (the same ReadCap/InboxScope rule, so this is a recurrence). Either a published signature uses them or they are unpublished.
2. Seven symbols annotated kind=invention level=none ref=none sit ABOVE the polyfill-era divider, under the heading that promises a target counterpart for every symbol (index.ts:45, :111-123). Either the annotation is wrong or they are on the wrong side of the divider.
3. docChangeType is published but absent from the concept contract's ## Surface, and nothing pins that block against the actual exports. Add it, and consider whether the block should be pinned by a test the way the deletion list already is.
4. account-registry.ts:971 annotates storeRegistry.resolveScopeGraph, unpublished since 1.0.0-dev.5. A provenance annotation on an unpublished symbol claims a surface that does not exist.

Hard gate: bun test -> 0 fail; both typechecks exit 0; python3 ~/.claude/skills/concept/lint.py -> 0 ERROR. Anti-cheat as usual. Any symbol you unpublish is a MAJOR by the contract's own change policy - follow it rather than deciding the level yourself.

Progress

Result