Files
ng-eventually/packages/polyfill/README.md
T
Sylvain Duchesne 737729c9ce refactor: le paquet s'appelle polyfill, « SDK » désigne celui de NextGraph
Le nom @ng-eventually/sdk entrait en collision avec le SDK de NextGraph, dont
ce paquet est justement un polyfill. Impossible d'écrire « le SDK » sans lever
l'ambiguïté à chaque phrase — et le contrat publié, lu par une application,
était le pire endroit pour laisser traîner ça.

packages/sdk → packages/polyfill, @ng-eventually/sdk → @ng-eventually/polyfill,
contract_sdk-surface → contract_polyfill-surface, e2e/sdk-entry.ts →
e2e/polyfill-entry.ts, docs/sdk-reference.md → docs/polyfill-reference.md.

Les occurrences de « SDK » qui désignent celui de NextGraph restent intactes,
y compris les chemins dans nextgraph-rs (sdk/js/orm, sdk/js/web). Le tri s'est
fait occurrence par occurrence, pas par substitution.

Le contrat énonce désormais son identité en une phrase : « This package is a
polyfill of NextGraph's SDK. »
2026-08-10 17:14:25 +02:00

125 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown

# @ng-eventually/polyfill
One entry point. Most of what it publishes has the same signature as the future SDK —
`ng`, `useShape`, `watchShape`, `docs`, `inbox`, `storeRegistry`, `readUnion` (+ types) —
and is a drop-in for `@ng-org/web` / `@ng-org/orm`: as NextGraph matures it resolves to
the real SDK (build alias removed) with no code change.
**One call does not, and it is the whole of what you will delete:** `configure`. It
exists because one shared wallet hosts every user; upstream, an application imports the
SDK and each user opens their own wallet. `src/index.ts` groups it under a heading that
says so. (`ensureIdentity` is a second in substance — the shared-wallet gate — but its
call site survives: an application still awaits a session before it renders.)
*(There were two entry points until 2026-08-07, `.` and `./polyfill`, and the second one
WAS that list. One door is easier to import from and says less — hence the grouping, and
hence `docs/api-contract.md`, whose export inventory a test keeps honest.)*
Per-symbol, with the target signature and an epistemic label on every claim:
[`docs/api-contract.md`](../../docs/api-contract.md).
> **Reading is key possession, and the isolation here is still fake.** The cap surface
> has the shape of the real model — you hold a document's `ReadCap` or you do not read
> it, and there is no authorization list anywhere — but nothing is encrypted yet and
> the stand-in key is a constant. Nothing this library does may be described as
> "anonymous" or "private" until per-document encryption lands (P1b).
```ts
import {
// SDK-shaped — the real SDK replaces these in place.
ensureIdentity, storeRegistry, inbox, readUnion, docs,
// Polyfill-era — one call, and it is the whole of what goes away.
configure,
} from "@ng-eventually/polyfill";
configure({ ng: realNg, useShape: realUseShape, getSession, sharedWallet });
await ensureIdentity(); // who I am (returned), connection work awaited
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
await docs.sparqlUpdate(sid, `INSERT DATA { … }`, doc);
const subjects = await readUnion(await storeRegistry.listMyEntityDocs("protected"));
```
## Principle — the polyfill compensates, it never extends
**Its only reason to exist is to bridge a NextGraph implementation gap.** Every
non-SDK surface must map to something NextGraph will provide natively, and must fall
away at that point — no bespoke features, no observability, no convenience API that
isn't strictly *"NextGraph will do this later"*. The test for any proposed addition:
*does it compensate a real, exhibited gap?* If not, it belongs in the consumer
application. And a compensation whose gap is not actually exhibited on the target
broker is dead weight, not defensive code.
Both halves are binding — **the surface AND the implementation** stay as close as
possible to what NextGraph plans. The question to ask at every choice: *would this
make a caller learn something it has to UNLEARN at migration?* If yes, it is a
deviation, whatever it buys.
What the polyfill adds, each emulated now and native later:
- **Shared-wallet identity** — one wallet hosts every user, so the library fabricates
*virtual users* and confines every access to the connected one
(`emulated-verifier/reach.ts`). Upstream, each user opens their own wallet.
- **Capability emulation** — per-identity cap possession plus a read filter over it:
you read the documents whose cap you hold. There is no authorization list, because
the real model has none.
- **Inbox** — `post`, `postToDocument`, `share`, and the recipient's processing.
The model is verified (an inbox is a keypair on one repo); no JS surface exists yet.
Generic by construction: no application domain here. See
[`examples/notebook`](../../examples/notebook) for an application written against it,
which the e2e suite drives.
## How a document is reached — the three acts, and no others
```ts
import { storeRegistry, inbox, readUnion } from "@ng-eventually/polyfill";
// 1. CREATE — you hold its cap, with nothing to declare. No identity parameter: a
// session belongs to one user, exactly as the target's own `doc_create` assumes.
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
// 2. GIVE TO READ — name the document and the person. The key is looked up and
// sealed into a deposit; the recipient applies it by connecting, with nothing
// to call. Irreversible: there is no revoking a key already handed out.
await inbox.share(doc, "bob");
// 3. CIRCULATE THE REFERENCE — no call at all. Every reference this surface returns
// is BARE: it names the document and grants nothing. If the document sits in a
// PUBLIC store, the store serves its read cap to whoever asks, so the bare
// reference is enough to read it — and if it does not, the reference still names
// it and opens nothing.
const publicDoc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("public");
// …put `publicDoc` in a QR code, a message, another document. Nothing else to do.
await readUnion([publicDoc]); // a stranger holding only this reads it
```
**The invariant behind all three: you never derive a cap from a bare reference.** You
look it up in what you hold, you were given it, or a public store served it. A
`did:ng:o:…` without `:r:` names a document and opens nothing — which is what makes
confidentiality composable: a widely circulated document may point at a restricted
one, and following the reference gets you a name, not a key. See
[`docs/readcap-and-nuri-model.md`](../../docs/readcap-and-nuri-model.md) § 0.
## The types carry that invariant
`Nuri` and `ReadCap` are **template literal types**, not `string` aliases:
```ts
type Nuri = `did:ng:${string}`
type ReadCap = `did:ng:${string}:r:${string}`
```
They are still strings — assignable to `string`, JSON-serializable, no wrapper — but
the distinction is checked. A `ReadCap` goes wherever a `Nuri` is expected (a cap *is*
a NURI with the key inside); the reverse does not compile.
**Permissive in, precise out.** Public entries take `NuriLike` (`Nuri | string`) and
validate at the door, so a value coming from storage, a URL or a form needs no
narrowing and no cast on your side; what they *return* is a precise `Nuri`. The
runtime checks stay regardless — a JavaScript caller never meets the compiler.
```ts
const saved = localStorage.getItem("doc"); // string | null
if (saved) await readUnion([saved]); // ✓ validated at the door
```