Files
ng-eventually/packages/client/docs/sdk-reference.md
T
Sylvain Duchesne 8a382f29f8 feat(inbox): l'inbox d'un document est adressable par tout détenteur
Répond au brief 2026-08-03 remonté depuis le consommateur. `documentInbox(doc)`
répondait « quelle inbox est-ce que MOI je connais pour ce document » et en
créait une quand la réponse était « aucune » : un tiers n'atteignait jamais
l'inbox du propriétaire, il en obtenait une à lui, que personne ne lit, et son
dépôt disparaissait sans erreur. C'est l'acte central du consommateur —
s'inscrire à l'événement d'un autre — qui était silencieusement perdu.

Lire une inbox et savoir où y déposer sont deux actes opposés, avec des publics
opposés. Ils sont désormais deux fonctions :

- `openDocumentInbox(doc)` — le PROPRIÉTAIRE ouvre une inbox dédiée. Refuse sur
  la PROPRIÉTÉ (lue depuis les branches Store), pas sur la possession du cap :
  un cap se reçoit, et un destinataire ne doit pas pouvoir rediriger vers lui
  les dépôts destinés au propriétaire.
- `documentInboxAddress(doc)` — n'importe quel détenteur trouve où déposer. Ne
  crée jamais rien.

L'adresse est publiée dès la CRÉATION, sur la branche Header émulée du document
— un sujet réservé à l'intérieur du document, donc lisible par qui détient le
document. Publier seulement le jour où le propriétaire ouvre une inbox dédiée
laisserait une fenêtre pendant laquelle un tiers lit le document, ne trouve
aucune adresse, et ne peut pas joindre le propriétaire du tout.

Sur le coût mesuré par le brief (9m37 → 21m30) : il venait de la création d'un
DOCUMENT supplémentaire par document. L'adresse publiée pointe vers l'inbox
propre du propriétaire, qui existe déjà et s'amortit sur tous ses documents ;
la création grandit d'un triple, pas d'un document. Le dépôt porte le document
concerné, donc le propriétaire matérialise toujours par document. La forme
« dérivable » du brief n'était pas disponible : notre inbox est un document, et
un NURI dérivé nommerait un repo que `doc_create` n'a jamais créé.

Le tout reflète la séparation d'amont : un déposant scelle avec la clé PUBLIQUE
de l'inbox et n'a besoin de rien d'autre, seul le propriétaire détient la
moitié privée — une adresse est donc publique par nature.

`src/machinery.ts` : l'espace de noms `urn:ng-eventually:` que la bibliothèque
se réserve, et le prédicat que le chemin de lecture utilise. La branche Header
est le premier compartiment logé dans un document que le consommateur lit ;
`read-model` écarte désormais tout sujet de cet espace, par SUJET et non par
prédicat — ce qui couvre toutes les branches émulées, présentes et futures.

Question ouverte du brief, tranchée : « une inbox de document adressable par
tout détenteur » est une invention de cette bibliothèque, pas de l'amont — aucun
document n'y a d'inbox, ni le store privé. Ce qui EST vérifié, c'est la forme
qui rend l'anticipation défendable : `AddInboxCapV0` est clé par `repo_id`.

Tests : le test qui validait « n'importe qui dépose » passait le NURI d'inbox au
déposant par une variable du test — chemin qu'aucune app n'a. Réécrit avec les
deux acteurs cloisonnés : le déposant reçoit le lien du document, qui est la
seule chose qui circule dans ce modèle, et doit trouver l'adresse lui-même. Le
fake `ng` gagne le SELECT de la branche Header et le `DELETE WHERE` (sans quoi
un remplacement devenait une accumulation, précisément le bug qu'il évite).

157 tests unitaires, e2e 40/40 contre le broker en ligne.
2026-08-03 16:02:11 +02:00

340 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# SDK reference — reading data with `@ng-eventually/client`
**Audience:** anyone using `@ng-eventually/client` (the app that consumes it, and
the lib itself when honoring the contract). This is the reference on the SDK's
**read/reactivity surface** — how you read data and how a read stays live.
`@ng-eventually/client` is written and consumed as if NextGraph were a **finished,
mature SDK**: documents per entity placed by scope, capabilities, inboxes, and a
**reactive ORM**. This file documents that finished-SDK contract. Where today's
emulation does not yet deliver it, that is called out in one clearly-separated
section at the end ([§ Current emulation status](#current-emulation-status)) and in
[`nextgraph-current-state.md`](../../../docs/nextgraph-current-state.md) — that is
an emulation gap to close, **not** the SDK's design. Read the reference itself as the
target contract.
The ground truth for the finished contract is the real NextGraph platform
(`nextgraph-rs`, sibling clone at `../nextgraph-rs`); the reactive primitives are
cited by `file:symbol` throughout so a future agent can re-verify cheaply.
---
## TL;DR — the canonical read is reactive
> **Read data with the reactive ORM hook `useShape` — subscribe to a shape over a
> scope, get the current value, and re-render on every change (yours or a remote
> peer's, synced through the broker). Subscription/push, never polling. One-shot
> reads are the exception, not the rule.**
```ts
import { useShape } from "@ng-eventually/client";
import { EventShapeType } from "…/shapes/orm/…";
function EventList() {
// A live, reactive set. Re-renders whenever any Event doc in scope changes —
// locally or from a remote peer synced by the broker. No polling, no refetch.
const events = useShape(EventShapeType, { graphs: [scopeNuri] });
return <>{[...events].map((e) => <Row key={e["@id"]} event={e} />)}</>;
}
```
---
## The reactivity model — subscription/push, never polling
NextGraph's philosophy is **subscription-based push**. You do not poll for changes;
you **subscribe once** and the platform **pushes** an update to every subscriber the
moment a document changes. A change is a new **commit** on a document's branch, and
it reaches subscribers whether it was applied **locally** (your own write) or
**delivered from a remote peer** and synced through the broker.
The load-bearing fact — verified in `nextgraph-rs` — is that both origins converge
on a single push point in the verifier:
- **Local commit** (your own SPARQL update / ORM write): the write path builds
`BranchUpdateInfo`s and calls `Verifier::update_graph`
(`engine/verifier/src/commits/transaction.rs:646`).
- **Remote commit** (another session/peer, synced via the broker): the broker hands
the event to `Verifier::deliver` (`engine/verifier/src/verifier.rs:1718`) →
`verify_commit``verify_async_transaction`
(`engine/verifier/src/commits/transaction.rs:295`), which calls the **same**
`update_graph` (`transaction.rs:327`).
- **The single choke point:** `update_graph` pushes an `AppResponseV0::Patch` to the
branch's subscribers via `Verifier::push_app_response`
(`engine/verifier/src/verifier.rs:252`) — it looks up the branch in
`branch_subscriptions` and `sender.send(response).await`**and** fans out to the
reactive ORM via `orm_backend_update`
(`engine/verifier/src/orm/graph/handle_backend_update.rs:48`), which sends an
`AppResponseV0::GraphOrmUpdate` to each ORM subscription whose scope was touched.
So: **one document, one commit, every subscriber pushed** — the same code path for a
local edit and for a remote peer's edit arriving over the network. That is what makes
a `useShape` read reactive *across peers* with no polling.
---
## The recommended read path — the reactive ORM hook `useShape`
`useShape` is **the** way to read. It subscribes to a **shape** (a typed view — the
SHEX/ORM shape) over a **scope** (one or more document NURIs / a subject set), returns
the current materialized set immediately, and **re-renders the component on every
change** to any document in scope.
### Signature
```ts
useShape<T extends BaseType>(
shape: ShapeType<T>,
scope: Scope | string | undefined,
): DeepSignalSet<T>
```
- `shape` — the ORM shape type (generated from a SHEX shape). Names the entity type
and the properties to materialize.
- `scope` — where to read: a `{ graphs, subjects }` scope object or a NURI string.
**Not to be confused with this library's `Scope`** (`types.ts`), which is the
literal union `public | protected | private` naming a store. Same word, two
meanings: the ORM's is a read target, ours is a placement.
`undefined` yields an empty read.
- **Returns** a `DeepSignalSet<T>` — a **live reactive set**. Iterate it like a set;
the component re-renders whenever the set changes.
Verified surface in `nextgraph-rs`:
`sdk/js/orm/src/frontendAdapters/react/useShape.ts` (`useShape`, line 86) →
`OrmSubscription` (`sdk/js/orm/src/connector/GraphOrmSubscription.ts`), which calls
`ng.orm_start_graph(...)` with a callback, applies the initial materialized objects
and every subsequent patch to a `DeepSignalSet`
(`applyPatchesToDeepSignal`), and drives React re-render via
`useDeepSignal` (`@ng-org/alien-deepsignals/react`). Vue and Svelte adapters exist
alongside the React one (`sdk/js/orm/src/frontendAdapters/{vue,svelte}/`).
`@ng-eventually/client` re-exports `useShape` from
[`../src/use-shape.ts`](../src/use-shape.ts); import it from the SDK
(`@ng-eventually/client`), never from `@ng-org/orm` directly.
### What you get, in order
1. **An initial value.** On subscribe, the ORM materializes the current objects in
scope and delivers them first (`AppResponseV0::GraphOrmInitial`,
`engine/verifier/src/orm/graph/initialize.rs:113`). The hook returns them as the
initial `DeepSignalSet`.
2. **A stream of updates.** On every subsequent commit affecting the scope — local or
remote — the ORM pushes a patch (`AppResponseV0::GraphOrmUpdate`), the connector
applies it to the `DeepSignalSet`, and the component re-renders. No refetch, no
interval.
### Under the hood — the streamed primitives
`useShape` is built on NextGraph's streamed request primitives. A consumer never
calls these directly, but they define the contract:
- `orm_start_graph(shape, scope, …, callback)` — the reactive **graph ORM**
subscription (`sdk/js/lib-wasm/src/lib.rs:1951`). Returns `GraphOrmInitial` then a
stream of `GraphOrmUpdate`. This is what `useShape` uses.
- `orm_start_discrete(nuri, …, callback)` — the reactive **discrete** (Yjs/Automerge
document) ORM (`lib-wasm/src/lib.rs:1929`); `DiscreteOrmInitial` then
`DiscreteOrmUpdate`.
- `doc_subscribe(nuri, …, callback)` — a lower-level **document** subscription
(`lib-wasm/src/lib.rs:1908`; verifier `Verifier::create_branch_subscription`,
`verifier.rs:352`). Delivers an initial `TabInfo` + `State` (heads, full graph,
discrete state, files — `verifier.rs:470`/`:476`) then a stream of `Patch` on each
commit. This is the raw reactive read; `useShape` is the typed, ergonomic layer on
top.
- All of these are **streamed** (marked by `AppRequestCommandV0::is_stream()`,
`engine/net/src/app_protocol.rs:762`) and delivered through the one generic streamed
binding `app_request_stream_` (`lib-wasm/src/lib.rs:1385`), which invokes a JS
callback per `AppResponse` and returns a cancel function. The reactive surface is
**callback-based** at the wasm boundary; `useShape` hides that behind a reactive
signal.
> **Rule of thumb:** to read, `useShape`. It subscribes, gives you the value now, and
> keeps it live. Reach for a one-shot read only when you explicitly do *not* want to
> stay subscribed.
---
## The one-shot read — the exception
Sometimes you want the current value **once**, with no live subscription (a batch, a
guard, a migration). NextGraph's one-shot read is a plain SPARQL query — non-streamed,
computes a result and returns once (`sparql_query`,
`sdk/js/lib-wasm/src/lib.rs:352`/`553`; no "subscribe to a query" exists —
`sparql_query` is not reactive).
In `@ng-eventually/client` the one-shot read is exposed as:
- **`docs.sparqlQuery(sid, query, base?, anchor?)`** — a raw anchored SPARQL query
([`../src/docs.ts`](../src/docs.ts)). `anchor` = the document NURI to read; the
anchor restricts the query to that one repo's graph.
- **`readModel.readUnion(docs)`** — read a **bounded, by-need set** of document NURIs,
each with its own anchored query, grouped per subject
([`../src/read-model.ts`](../src/read-model.ts)). This is the polyfill's listing
primitive (see [§ Current emulation status](#current-emulation-status) and
[`read-model.md`](../../../docs/read-model.md)).
One-shot reads do not re-render on change. To stay live over a one-shot read you must
re-run it on a change **signal** (e.g. re-call `readUnion` when a `doc_subscribe`
fires) — a manual assembly that exists only because of the emulation gap below; the
finished contract is `useShape`.
---
## The write surface (at a glance)
You do not need the write internals to read, but reads and writes share the same
document model, so briefly:
- **Create a document:** `docs.docCreate(sid, crdt, cls, dest, store?)`
([`../src/docs.ts`](../src/docs.ts)) — mirrors `ng.doc_create`. **One document = one
repo** (`did:ng:o:<RepoID>`); there is no separate `Document` type.
- **Write into it:** `docs.sparqlUpdate(sid, query, anchor)` — a SPARQL
`INSERT/DELETE` scoped to the anchor document's graph. Or, at the ORM layer, the ORM
update primitives (`graph_orm_update`). A write is a **commit** on the document's
branch — which is exactly what every `useShape` subscriber over that document is
pushed.
- **Writes target one document**, never "the union": a SPARQL update must name one
document's graph (`resolve_target_for_sparql(update=true)` returns `InvalidTarget`
for the union, `engine/verifier/src/request_processor.rs:275`).
---
## Identity & scope (what a consumer needs)
Data is isolated **per document (repo)**, and each document lives in a **scope**:
| Scope | Read | Write |
|---|---|---|
| **Private** | Owner only | Owner only |
| **Protected** | Owner + whoever the owner delivered the cap to | Owner + permissioned collaborators |
| **Public** | Whoever has the URL (the repo link) | **Owner only** |
Consequences a consumer must internalize:
- **Reading is key possession, never an authorization list.** You hold a document's
`ReadCap` (`…:r:{cap}`) or you do not read it — there is no "may X read Y?" to ask,
here or upstream. A cap-less `did:ng:o:…` **names** a document without granting
anything, which is what lets public content point at private content without
disclosing it. Caps reach you two ways: creating a document files its own, and
someone delivering one to your inbox (`shareCap`). Nothing derives a cap from a
bare reference.
- **Isolation is per-document, not per-store.** Holding a store's cap does **not**
grant read on the documents it contains — each document has its own ReadCap. Fine-
grained isolation therefore means **one document per entity**
(`engine/repo/src/types.rs`, ReadCap granularity; see
[`nextgraph-current-state.md`](../../../docs/nextgraph-current-state.md) §
*Capability / ReadCap granularity*).
- **Read isolation is cryptographic.** A reactive/union read over a repo you hold no
cap for simply returns nothing (the repo is never decrypted); a *targeted* read of
an unheld repo raises `RepoNotFound`.
- **Public means everyone reads, only the owner writes.** There is **no** primitive by
which a non-owner appends to a document (public or otherwise): a write commit
requires repo **membership** plus a matching write permission, gated by
`Repo::verify_permission` (`engine/repo/src/repo.rs:584` — a non-member author is
`PermissionDenied`) and cryptographically bound to the repo's write-cap secret. The
permission enum (`engine/repo/src/types.rs:1729`, `PermissionV0`) has `WriteAsync`/
`WriteSync` but **no** add-only/append permission and **no** public-writable grant.
To surface data to others without a shared write, use the **inbox** (any identity —
even anonymous — can deposit; only the owner reads back) or make the document
**public-readable** and let each identity own its own document. *Per-document inboxes
are this library's, not the engine's: upstream only the public and protected store
repos carry one (`engine/verifier/src/site.rs:128,149`).*
Depositing into a document you do not own is two calls, and the first is the one that
makes it possible at all:
```ts
const where = await storeRegistry.documentInboxAddress(doc); // Nuri | undefined
if (where) await inbox.post(where, { payload: { signingUp: true } });
```
You need the **document** (its cap), nothing else — the address rides on it and is
published from creation. `undefined` means you cannot read the document, not that the
owner is unreachable. Reading that inbox is a different right, and it stays the
owner's (`inbox.read` refuses otherwise).
The consumer asks the SDK for what it needs and trusts the result; it does not
construct NURIs, pick union-vs-anchor, or reason about caps. The domain-shaped list
helpers live in the consumer app; the SDK exposes the generic reactive/by-need read.
---
## Current emulation status
> **This section is about where today's polyfill does NOT yet deliver the reactive
> contract above.** It is an **emulation gap to close**, not the SDK's design. The
> reference above is the target; the finished SDK reads reactively via `useShape`
> everywhere. Full detail:
> [`nextgraph-current-state.md`](../../../docs/nextgraph-current-state.md),
> [`read-model.md`](../../../docs/read-model.md),
> [`simulation.md`](../../../docs/simulation.md).
Today, on a single shared wallet emulating the mature platform, four gaps diverge
from the reactive contract:
1. **Entity-list reads are one-shot, not reactive.** The reactive ORM cannot be used
as the listing primitive because the ORM fan-out over a set of per-entity /
not-yet-synced document graphs **hangs**: a freshly-created or unsynced graph makes
`RepoNotFound` abort the whole `orm_start_graph`, so the subscription never emits
its initial and never resolves (root cause verified —
`engine/verifier/src/request_processor.rs` `resolve_target` →
`self.repos.get(...).ok_or(RepoNotFound)`; see
[`nextgraph-current-state.md`](../../../docs/nextgraph-current-state.md) § *The ORM
fan-out hang*). So the lib reads entity lists with **`readModel.readUnion`** — a
bounded set of one-shot anchored `sparql_query`s
([`read-model.md`](../../../docs/read-model.md)) — and reassembles reactivity by
**re-querying on a change signal** (a lightweight `doc_subscribe` / single-store ORM
used only as a *signal* source, then re-run `readUnion`). `useShape` remains valid
for a **single already-opened document**; it is the per-entity **fan-out** that is
unfit today.
2. **The inbox uses a polling watcher.** The inbox is emulated
(`AppRequestCommandV0::InboxPost` has no verifier arm today; no wasm helper seals a
deposit), so `inbox.watch` ([`../src/inbox.ts`](../src/inbox.ts)) **polls** via
`setInterval` (default 1s) instead of subscribing. The finished contract is push
(the broker already routes the inbox natively); these become subscriptions when the
sealed-inbox path (`inbox_post_link`) lands.
3. **No cross-wallet / on-demand repo open.** There is no JS primitive to sync an
*unknown* repo by NURI+ReadCap today (`load_repo_from_read_cap` is `pub(crate)`,
unexposed; the `OpenRepo` broker path is a TODO at
`engine/verifier/src/verifier.rs:1423`). The mono-wallet polyfill sidesteps this:
every account's docs are `doc_create`d in the same session, so they are already
queryable. At the multi-store migration, opening a repo by cap becomes a native
broker sync and the anchored read is unchanged.
4. **The subscription may not echo the writer's OWN local commit — HYPOTHESIS
(high-confidence), confirmation in progress (2026-07-18); NOT confirmed, NOT
fixed.** Unlike gaps 13 (designed emulation stopgaps), this is a suspected
defect in the polyfill's own reactive assembly. When a client does a local
`sparqlUpdate` on a doc it is itself subscribed to (`subscribeDoc` /
`ng.doc_subscribe`), the subscription callback appears NOT to fire for its OWN
local commit in the same session — so the reactive re-read chain
([`../src/watch-shape.ts`](../src/watch-shape.ts) `watchShape` → `reread` →
[`../src/read-model.ts`](../src/read-model.ts) `readUnion`) never runs, and
consumers keep the STALE value until the next connection delivers a fresh
initial `State`. **Remote** commits DO push correctly (verified: cross-browser
reactive update works). A code review verified the consumer wiring is correct,
the doc IS in the subscribed set, and a triggered re-read WOULD return the new
value — leaving the self-commit echo as the only suspect link. That link is
**INFERRED**, not observed: the real `ng.doc_subscribe` runtime is not readable
from source, and [`../src/subscribe.ts`](../src/subscribe.ts)'s own doc-comment
CLAIMS local writes push a `Patch` — contradicted by the observation. (This
also sits in tension with § *The reactivity model* above, which documents the
target contract — one commit, every subscriber pushed, local or remote.) The
requirement at stake is multi-user: a value change (e.g. a participant count)
must propagate reactively to ALL viewers — other viewers (remote push, which
works) AND the writer's own view (this suspect link). **Treatment (PLANNED,
not done):** confirm first via the temporary instrumentation just added
([`../src/subscribe.ts`](../src/subscribe.ts) ≈`:119` logs
`doc_subscribe FIRE <nuri> (State|Patch)`;
[`../src/watch-shape.ts`](../src/watch-shape.ts) ≈`:341` logs
`reread TRIGGER by <nuri>` — line numbers volatile, grep the log strings);
then, IF confirmed, fix **polyfill-side** — a
local commit should notify the doc's active `subscribeDoc` callbacks.
Consumers must not compensate. Short entry:
[`nextgraph-current-state.md`](../../../docs/nextgraph-current-state.md) §
*Known open issues*.
When these gaps close, the read path collapses to the reference above: `useShape`
everywhere, push everywhere, no polling and no re-query-on-signal assembly.