Files
ng-eventually/packages/client/test/caps.test.ts
T
Sylvain Duchesne 3c981ffadb docs: le nommage de NextGraph l'emporte toujours — y compris sur nos propres règles
La règle que je venais d'écrire bannissait « publish » sans réserve. Or le
moteur emploie `publisher` 126 fois — `as_publisher`, `publisher_advert` — pour
un rôle pub/sub sur un topic. Une règle appliquée à la lettre aurait fait
rejeter du vocabulaire amont, ce qui est exactement l'inverse du but.

Le principe est donc posé au-dessus, et il prime sur tout : là où la cible a un
mot, c'est le mot, point. Ce qui reste banni est NOTRE « publier un document »,
qui n'a aucun référent en amont et recouvre trois actes distincts — placer dans
un store public, rendre trouvable, remettre une clé. Ça n'autorise jamais à
renommer ce que l'amont appelle `publisher`.

`publisher`, `topic` et `advert` rejoignent le vocabulaire déclaré du contrôle
de noms, avec la raison en commentaire.

Le renommage `publishRepoLink` → `recordInPublicStore` reste justifié : cette
méthode n'a pas de pendant amont, elle enregistre un document en store public
(et, artefact d'émulation, lui frappe une clé).
2026-08-06 15:50:54 +02:00

166 lines
6.9 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* caps.test.ts — the cap surface as KEY POSSESSION.
*
* What these prove is a SHAPE, not a protection (the library is deliberately
* insecure until P1b): the only question the registry can answer is "do I hold
* this document's cap?", there is no principal to look up in a list, and no
* function turns a bare reference into a cap.
*/
import { test, expect } from "bun:test";
import { CapRegistry } from "../src/emulated-verifier/caps";
import { hasReadCap, targetOf } from "../src/model/nuri";
import type { ReadCap } from "../src/model/types";
/** A registry whose holder the test drives. */
function registry(initial: string | null = "alice") {
let holder = initial;
const caps = new CapRegistry(() => holder);
return { caps, become: (id: string | null) => (holder = id) };
}
test("a cap NAMES and READS; the bare reference only names", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
const doc = "did:ng:o:doc1:v:overlay";
// Before anything: naming a document tells you nothing about reading it.
expect(caps.capFor(doc)).toBeUndefined();
const cap = caps.mint(doc);
expect(hasReadCap(cap)).toBe(true); // carries `:r:`
expect(hasReadCap(doc)).toBe(false);
expect(targetOf(cap)).toBe(doc); // same object, key inside
expect(caps.capFor(doc)).toBe(cap);
// Looking the cap up by the cap-bearing form resolves the same document.
expect(caps.capFor(cap)).toBe(cap);
});
test("no cap is derivable from a bare reference — you look it up or you were given it", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
caps.mint("did:ng:o:mine");
// A document that never entered the held caps stays unreadable, however well-formed
// its reference is. There is no `grantRead`, and no principal to name.
expect(caps.capFor("did:ng:o:someone-else")).toBeUndefined();
});
// Passing the naming form where the reading form is meant is now a COMPILE error
// (`ReadCap` is a template literal type). The runtime refusal still has to hold,
// because a JavaScript consumer — or a cap read back from storage, a URL or JSON
// and cast rather than narrowed — never meets the compiler. The `as` below is
// exactly that consumer: it is how the mistake reaches the library at all.
// Unchecked, it would file a bare reference as its own cap and make the document
// read — the exact inversion this batch removes.
test("learn REFUSES a bare reference, even when the compiler was bypassed", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
const bare = "did:ng:o:someone-elses-doc" as ReadCap; // a JS consumer / an unchecked cast
expect(() => caps.learn(bare)).toThrow(/naming is not reading|bare reference/i);
expect(caps.capFor("did:ng:o:someone-elses-doc")).toBeUndefined(); // nothing was filed
expect(caps.isEnforcing()).toBe(false); // and nothing was issued
});
test("holding one document's cap grants nothing on another (no inheritance)", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
caps.mint("did:ng:o:doc1");
expect(caps.capFor("did:ng:o:doc1")).toBeDefined();
expect(caps.capFor("did:ng:o:doc2")).toBeUndefined(); // separate repo, separate cap
});
test("one set of held caps PER holder: switching identity switches heldByHolder, it does not wipe", () => {
const { caps, become } = registry("alice");
const doc = "did:ng:o:alice-doc";
const cap = caps.mint(doc);
become("bob");
expect(caps.capFor(doc)).toBeUndefined(); // bob holds nothing of alice's
become("alice");
expect(caps.capFor(doc)).toBe(cap); // …and alice did not lose hers
});
test("a cap received (learn) reads, exactly like one minted", () => {
const alice = registry("alice");
const doc = "did:ng:o:shared";
const cap = alice.caps.mint(doc);
const bob = registry("bob");
expect(bob.caps.capFor(doc)).toBeUndefined();
bob.caps.learn(cap); // delivered to bob's inbox, absorbed
expect(bob.caps.capFor(doc)).toBe(cap);
});
test("recordInPublicStore returns a cap-bearing link; reading it still means HOLDING it", () => {
const { caps, become } = registry("alice");
const doc = "did:ng:o:public-doc";
const link = caps.recordInPublicStore(doc);
expect(hasReadCap(link)).toBe(true);
expect(targetOf(link)).toBe(doc);
expect(caps.isInPublicStore(doc)).toBe(true);
expect(caps.isInPublicStore("did:ng:o:other")).toBe(false);
// Publication is not a world-wide read grant: whoever HAS the URL reads it.
become("bob");
expect(caps.capFor(doc)).toBeUndefined();
caps.learn(link); // bob received the link (e.g. from the discovery index)
expect(caps.capFor(doc)).toBe(link);
});
test("open(): a public document is published as a link, a private one is not", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
const pub = caps.open("did:ng:o:pub", "public");
const prot = caps.open("did:ng:o:prot", "protected");
const priv = caps.open("did:ng:o:priv", "private");
expect(caps.isInPublicStore("did:ng:o:pub")).toBe(true);
expect(caps.isInPublicStore("did:ng:o:prot")).toBe(false);
expect(caps.isInPublicStore("did:ng:o:priv")).toBe(false);
// All three are readable BY THEIR OWNER — a creator is never locked out.
for (const [doc, cap] of [["did:ng:o:pub", pub], ["did:ng:o:prot", prot], ["did:ng:o:priv", priv]] as const) {
expect(caps.capFor(doc)).toBe(cap);
}
});
test("open() is idempotent — re-listing my own documents refiles the same caps", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
const first = caps.open("did:ng:o:doc", "protected");
let fired = 0;
caps.onChange(() => (fired += 1));
expect(caps.open("did:ng:o:doc", "protected")).toBe(first);
expect(fired).toBe(0); // nothing changed → no spurious re-read
});
test("isEnforcing is false until the first cap exists, then holds for every holder", () => {
const { caps, become } = registry("alice");
expect(caps.isEnforcing()).toBe(false);
caps.mint("did:ng:o:doc1");
expect(caps.isEnforcing()).toBe(true);
// …including for a holder whose own holds nothing: that IS the isolation.
become("bob");
expect(caps.isEnforcing()).toBe(true);
expect(caps.capFor("did:ng:o:doc1")).toBeUndefined();
});
test("a cap arriving fires the change signal — an asynchronous delivery must re-trigger reads", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
let fired = 0;
const unsub = caps.onChange(() => (fired += 1));
caps.learn(caps.mint("did:ng:o:doc1")); // mint fires once; the learn is a no-op
expect(fired).toBe(1);
unsub();
caps.mint("did:ng:o:doc2");
expect(fired).toBe(1); // unsubscribed
});
test("write is restricted to write-cap holders (decorative until P1b)", () => {
const { caps } = registry();
expect(caps.hasWritePolicy()).toBe(false);
caps.grantWrite("did:ng:o:doc", "alice");
expect(caps.hasWritePolicy()).toBe(true);
expect(caps.governsWrite("did:ng:o:doc")).toBe(true);
expect(caps.governsWrite("did:ng:o:unknown")).toBe(false); // not declared → not enforced
expect(caps.canWrite("did:ng:o:doc", "alice")).toBe(true);
expect(caps.canWrite("did:ng:o:doc", "bob")).toBe(false);
expect(caps.canWrite("did:ng:o:doc", null)).toBe(false);
});