Files
ng-eventually/packages/sdk/test/app-surface.test.ts
T
Sylvain Duchesne 0d9e2bbe97 fix: mon correctif sur createEntityDoc était faux dans les deux sens
Second tour adverse sur le lot C. Six trouvailles, dont trois sur ce que je venais de
livrer.

**Le correctif de `createEntityDoc` reproduisait le défaut qu'il annonçait avoir fermé.**
Il levait sur la PREMIÈRE écriture de registre en échec. Or :

- lever sur le listing sautait l'écriture de la clé — détruisant le chemin de
  récupération que le commentaire d'à côté décrit explicitement (« la clé doit rester
  récupérable même si le listing a échoué »), et laissant le document orphelin ;
- lever sur la clé laissait le document LISTÉ sans clé — précisément l'état « se lit vide
  pour toujours » que je prétendais empêcher, en pire, puisque l'appelant n'a même plus
  sa référence.

Les deux écritures sont désormais tentées, ce qui atterrit reste, et l'échec est rapporté
après en nommant la moitié manquante.

**Le refus de `share` reposait sur une valeur qui confond absence et ignorance.**
`resolveAccount` avale toute erreur de lecture et rend `null`, si bien qu'un incident
réseau faisait répondre « personne ne s'est connecté sous ce nom » à propos de quelqu'un
qui existe. `lookupAccount` propage désormais l'erreur ; `resolveAccount` reste la forme
tolérante que tous les autres appelants veulent.

**J'avais livré ce comportement sans un seul test.** `test/app-surface.test.ts` en ajoute
huit, tous sur ce qu'un APPELANT voit : `ensureIdentity` rend l'identité, un appel de
placement avant connexion nomme l'erreur, le placement agit comme l'utilisateur connecté,
`share` refuse un nom inventé mais laisse remonter une panne, et une création à moitié
écrite échoue en disant quelle moitié — dont le cas « le listing a échoué, la clé est
quand même là ».

En écrivant ces tests j'ai refait dans leur faux la faute que cette revue a corrigée
ailleurs : ignorer le sujet dans la requête de compte, ce qui rendait le dossier d'un
autre utilisateur. Deux des huit échouaient pour cette raison, sans rapport avec le code.

**Et la documentation contredisait le code livré dans le même commit** : le README
enseignait encore `createEntityDoc(me, "protected")` — en JS la portée devient `"alice"` —
et le contrat déclarait `Nuri` là où le code et la feuille disent `NuriLike`.

197 tests unitaires, e2e 40/40 et applicatif 12/12.
2026-08-10 10:48:57 +02:00

196 lines
8.8 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* The app-facing surface, pinned where it changed shape on 2026-08-10.
*
* Every test here exists because behaviour shipped without one and an adversarial pass
* had to find it: an application that cannot learn its own identity, a share that invents
* its recipient, a creation that reports success on a half-written document. They are
* about what a CALLER sees, not about the emulation's internals.
*/
import { test, expect, mock, afterEach } from "bun:test";
import { configure, ensureIdentity, storeRegistry } from "../src/index";
import {
resetCaps,
resetConfig,
resetStoreRegistry,
setCurrentUser,
} from "../src/shared-wallet/bootstrap";
import { createEntityDoc as registryCreateEntityDoc, resetRegistryCache } from "../src/shared-wallet/account-registry";
import { share } from "../src/surface/inbox";
const SHIM = "urn:ng-eventually:shim";
const SESSION = { sessionId: "sid-app", privateStoreId: "PRIV-APP" };
interface Quad { g: string; s: string; p: string; o: string }
/** A stateful fake `ng`, with a switch that makes a chosen register write fail. */
function inject(failWriteMatching?: RegExp) {
const quads: Quad[] = [];
let created = 0;
const doc_create = mock(async () => `did:ng:o:doc${++created}`);
const sparql_update = mock(async (...a: unknown[]) => {
const query = a[1] as string;
const anchor = a[2] as string | undefined;
if (failWriteMatching && failWriteMatching.test(query)) throw new Error("broker refused");
if (!anchor) return undefined;
const gm = query.match(/GRAPH\s+<([^>]+)>\s*\{([\s\S]*)\}/);
const body = gm ? gm[2]! : query.replace(/^\s*INSERT DATA\s*\{/, "").replace(/\}\s*$/, "");
const sm = body.match(/<([^>]+)>/);
if (!sm) return undefined;
const subj = sm[1]!;
const pairRe = /(?:a|<([^>]+)>)\s+(?:"((?:[^"\\]|\\.)*)"|<([^>]+)>)/g;
let m: RegExpExecArray | null;
const after = body.slice(body.indexOf(sm[0]) + sm[0].length);
while ((m = pairRe.exec(after)) !== null) {
quads.push({ g: anchor, s: subj, p: m[1] ?? `${SHIM}:Account`, o: m[2] ?? m[3] ?? "" });
}
return undefined;
});
const sparql_query = mock(async (...a: unknown[]) => {
const query = a[1] as string;
const anchor = a[3] as string | undefined;
const byPred = (pred: string, v: string) => ({
results: { bindings: quads.filter((q) => q.g === anchor && q.p === pred).map((q) => ({ [v]: { value: q.o } })) },
});
if (query.includes(`${SHIM}:shimDoc`)) return byPred(`${SHIM}:shimDoc`, "shimDoc");
if (query.includes(`${SHIM}:readCap`)) return byPred(`${SHIM}:readCap`, "c");
if (query.includes(`${SHIM}:contains`)) return byPred(`${SHIM}:contains`, "e");
if (query.includes(`${SHIM}:id`)) {
// Filter by SUBJECT when the query names one — the account read asks about ONE
// account. A fake that ignores it hands back somebody else's record, and then
// "bob does not see alice's document" and "share refuses an unknown name" both
// fail for a reason that has nothing to do with the code. (Made that mistake here
// first; it is the same one this review found in the other fakes.)
const subjM = query.match(/<([^>]+)>\s+a\s+<urn:ng-eventually:shim:Account>/);
const only = subjM ? subjM[1]! : null;
const bySubject = new Map<string, Record<string, string>>();
for (const q of quads) {
if (q.g !== anchor) continue;
if (only !== null && q.s !== only) continue;
const rec = bySubject.get(q.s) ?? {};
if (q.p === `${SHIM}:id`) rec.id = q.o;
if (q.p === `${SHIM}:docPublic`) rec.docPublic = q.o;
if (q.p === `${SHIM}:docProtected`) rec.docProtected = q.o;
if (q.p === `${SHIM}:docPrivate`) rec.docPrivate = q.o;
bySubject.set(q.s, rec);
}
return {
results: {
bindings: [...bySubject.values()].filter((r) => r.id).map((r) => ({
id: { value: r.id! },
docPublic: { value: r.docPublic ?? "" },
docProtected: { value: r.docProtected ?? "" },
docPrivate: { value: r.docPrivate ?? "" },
})),
},
};
}
return { results: { bindings: [] } };
});
configure({
ng: { doc_create, sparql_update, sparql_query } as never,
useShape: (() => {}) as never,
getSession: async () => SESSION,
});
resetRegistryCache();
resetCaps();
setCurrentUser(null);
return { quads };
}
afterEach(() => {
resetConfig();
resetStoreRegistry();
resetCaps();
setCurrentUser(null);
});
// ── identity ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// An application has to know which user it is — to display it, at least. Upstream it
// does: it passes `user_id` to `session_start`, having got it from the wallet it opened.
// Here the gate chooses, so the gate returns. Without this the example application read
// the gate's own private storage key, which is a boundary no consumer should see.
test("ensureIdentity returns the identity it settled", async () => {
inject();
setCurrentUser("alice");
expect(await ensureIdentity()).toBe("alice");
});
// The other half of the same decision: no placement call TAKES an identity, because a
// session belongs to one user and the target's `doc_create` carries none. Calling one
// before signing in is a caller error worth naming, not an empty result.
test("a placement call before signing in names the mistake", async () => {
inject();
setCurrentUser(null);
await expect(storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected")).rejects.toThrow(/ensureIdentity/i);
await expect(storeRegistry.listMyEntityDocs("protected")).rejects.toThrow(/no identity/i);
});
test("placement acts as the connected user, with nothing passed", async () => {
inject();
setCurrentUser("alice");
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
expect(await storeRegistry.listMyEntityDocs("protected")).toContain(doc);
setCurrentUser("bob");
expect(await storeRegistry.listMyEntityDocs("protected")).not.toContain(doc);
});
// ── sharing names someone who exists ───────────────────────────────────────
test("share refuses a recipient nobody has signed in as, instead of creating them", async () => {
inject();
setCurrentUser("alice");
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
// "bpb" is a typo for "bob". It used to mint that name's three stores and an inbox,
// and the cap landed where nobody will ever look — with no error at all.
await expect(share(doc, "bpb")).rejects.toThrow(/no such recipient/i);
});
// …and the refusal must rest on ABSENCE, never on ignorance: `resolveAccount` answers
// `null` for a failed read as well as for a missing one, so a refusal built on it would
// tell a user "nobody has signed in as bob" because a query timed out.
test("a failed lookup surfaces as a failure, not as 'no such recipient'", async () => {
const { quads } = inject();
setCurrentUser("alice");
const doc = await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected");
setCurrentUser("bob");
await registryCreateEntityDoc("bob", "private"); // bob genuinely exists
setCurrentUser("alice");
resetRegistryCache(); // force a read rather than the cache
const { ng } = (await import("../src/shared-wallet/bootstrap")).getConfig();
const realQuery = ng.sparql_query;
(ng as { sparql_query: unknown }).sparql_query = async () => {
throw new Error("broker unreachable");
};
await expect(share(doc, "bob")).rejects.toThrow(/broker unreachable/i);
(ng as { sparql_query: unknown }).sparql_query = realQuery;
void quads;
});
// ── a creation that half-worked is a failure, and says which half ──────────
test("createEntityDoc reports a half-written document instead of returning its reference", async () => {
inject(/shim:contains/); // the LISTING write fails
setCurrentUser("alice");
await expect(storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected")).rejects.toThrow(/not listed in its store/i);
});
// Both writes are attempted before the failure is raised — the cap must land even when
// the listing did not, because either is worth having without the other. Throwing on the
// first one (2026-08-07) skipped the second and orphaned the document entirely.
test("a failed listing does not cost the document its key", async () => {
const { quads } = inject(/shim:contains/);
setCurrentUser("alice");
await storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected").catch(() => {});
expect(quads.some((q) => q.p === `${SHIM}:readCap`)).toBe(true);
});
test("a failed key write is reported too, and names that half", async () => {
inject(/shim:readCap/);
setCurrentUser("alice");
await expect(storeRegistry.createEntityDoc("protected")).rejects.toThrow(/key is not recorded/i);
});