Sylvain Duchesne
518292498a
P1a n'était qu'une section d'un brief de ~370 lignes charriant beaucoup de matière rétractée (lot PW barré, section membership en <details>, verdicts corrigés). Coder depuis ce fichier aurait été pénible et risqué. docs/briefs/2026-07-27-p1a-cap-surface.md — le lot actionnable, lisible seul : - un seul type nouveau, ReadCap, le nom de l'amont ; - capFor(nuri) sur le trousseau (la branche de store), avec l'avertissement que le trousseau n'est PAS le mécanisme de partage ; - shareCap(cap, toInbox) — un document, vers une ou plusieurs inboxes ; - rotation de clé : re-livraison automatique, rien à implémenter côté consommateur ; - contenu public : lisible par l'URL, non récursif ; - la frontière index.ts / polyfill, tranchée : signatures sur des chaînes, comme le vrai SDK ; - le test de recette sans crypto (watch-shape moissonne aujourd'hui toute chaîne did🆖 et la replie dans l'ensemble LU) ; - et ce que le lot ne fait PAS, pour ne pas le croire fini. Chaque écart écarté y est justifié plutôt que tu : types de marque, resolveCapLess, receivedCaps, refOf, parseNuri, PrincipalId. Le premier jet introduisait 8 notions nouvelles ; il en reste 2, et le critère est écrit noir sur blanc — toute notion inventée est une dette de vocabulaire. Le brief d'origine reste le chantier d'ensemble et pointe vers la fiche. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014GbGgNEHRejVKoREvFuDFg
130 lines
9.9 KiB
Markdown
130 lines
9.9 KiB
Markdown
# Brief — P1a: the capability surface
|
||
|
||
**Status: specified, ready to implement.** Extracted from `2026-07-20-caps-emulation-alignment.md` (which remains the wider chantier: P0 findings, P1b enforcement, P2–P4, and the adversarial reviews). This file is the actionable lot; read it alone to implement.
|
||
|
||
Written 2026-07-27, after two adversarial reviews and three corrections from the PO. Background: `../vision.md` (why this library exists), `../readcap-and-nuri-model.md` (the target model, verified against `nextgraph-rs`).
|
||
|
||
## Why this lot exists
|
||
|
||
`caps.ts` currently models read rights as an **ACL** — a `Map<doc, Set<principal>>` plus `grantRead(doc, grantee)`. That is the **exact inversion** of the real model, where reading is **key possession**: whoever holds the key reads, and there is no authorization list anywhere.
|
||
|
||
This is not a security problem — the library is deliberately insecure and that is accepted (see `../vision.md`). It is a **shape** problem, and shape is the only thing this library exists to get right. A consumer coded against an ACL is coded against a model that will never exist, and will have to be rewritten.
|
||
|
||
## Scope: shape only, not enforcement
|
||
|
||
- **P1a (this brief)** — the surface consumers see.
|
||
- **P1b (separate)** — per-doc encryption and closing the read paths that bypass the guard.
|
||
|
||
Only P1a blocks the consumer, because the consumer must be written as if NextGraph were finished. P1b can follow.
|
||
|
||
> **After P1a the shape is right and the isolation is still fake.** Nothing may be claimed as "anonymous" or "private" until P1b lands. Say so in the README if it helps.
|
||
|
||
## Guiding constraint: stay close to NextGraph's concepts
|
||
|
||
Stated by the PO, and it is the acceptance criterion for the design as much as for the code:
|
||
|
||
> Stay as close as possible to NextGraph's concepts — and to its SDK's — to keep development simple and to keep the number of notions someone must discover small when they already know NextGraph and open this library.
|
||
|
||
Every invented name is **vocabulary debt**: the reader has to carry a translation table in their head. The first draft of this spec introduced eight new notions; adversarial review reduced it to two. Hold that line.
|
||
|
||
## The design
|
||
|
||
### 1. Types — one new name
|
||
|
||
A NURI is **one object**, with or without the key inside — upstream, `NuriV0 { target, access }`, where a cap-less NURI simply has an empty `access`. `did:ng:` is the **URI scheme prefix**, present on inboxes, branches and overlays alike; it does not mean "without cap". The discriminant is the **`:k:` segment**.
|
||
|
||
```ts
|
||
type Nuri = string // did:ng:o:{doc}:v:{overlay} — names, does not read
|
||
type ReadCap = string // …:k:{key} — names AND reads
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
`Nuri` **keeps its current meaning** in this package (~90 call sites, untouched): the cap-less form. `ReadCap` is the upstream name — do not invent another.
|
||
|
||
A parsed form `{ target, readCap? }` — a 1:1 mirror of `NuriV0 { target, access }` — may be used **inside** the library. It must not surface in the SDK-identical entry's signatures.
|
||
|
||
**Do not use branded types.** They were in the first draft and were dropped deliberately: the real SDK takes `nuri: String` and enforces at **runtime, through cryptography**. A compile-time guarantee is a concept NextGraph does not have, and a consumer who typed everything would have to *un-type* it when the real SDK arrives — the opposite of the goal. The cost was also measured: branded types force a cast at every ORM and SPARQL boundary.
|
||
|
||
### 2. The keyring — where caps come from
|
||
|
||
`doc_create` returns a **cap-less** NURI. So a rule like "no function ever goes from a bare reference to a cap" is wrong: it would leave a document's own creator unable to obtain that document's cap.
|
||
|
||
The real mechanism: on every document creation, an `AddRepo { read_cap }` is committed to a **branch of the store** (the store is itself a repo, with typed branches — "branch" here has nothing to do with git). That branch lists the store's documents, each with its read key. **It is the owner's keyring.** Upstream, the keyring is the **wallet**.
|
||
|
||
```ts
|
||
capFor(nuri: Nuri): ReadCap | undefined
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The invariant, correctly stated:
|
||
|
||
> **You do not derive a cap from a bare reference. You look it up in your keyring — or you were given it.**
|
||
|
||
`capFor` absorbs `canRead(doc)` (`capFor(n) !== undefined`) and drops its ACL verb.
|
||
|
||
**The keyring is not the sharing mechanism.** Handing over a store cap would give away everything the store contains, present and future. That is not the gesture (see §3). This confusion is easy and expensive — it was made once already during design.
|
||
|
||
### 3. Sharing — one document, to one or more recipients
|
||
|
||
**The unit of sharing is the document**, consistent with the consumer's own doctrine ("the document is the unit of sharing and of rights").
|
||
|
||
```ts
|
||
shareCap(cap: ReadCap, toInbox: Nuri): Promise<void>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Recipients are addressed as **inboxes** — which `inbox.post(targetInbox: Nuri)` already does in this package. There is no `PrincipalId` here: that notion exists nowhere upstream, and the first draft removed `principal` from `canRead` (calling it the ACL inversion) only to reintroduce it here.
|
||
|
||
**Caps received need no dedicated operation.** They arrive as inbox deposits of kind `cap`, consumed by the **existing** `inbox.watch`. This also fixes a known gap: a cap delivered asynchronously now triggers a re-read naturally, instead of leaving stale views.
|
||
|
||
> **Upstream status: this is a GAP, not a disagreement.** The field exists (`ContactDetails.read_cap`, commented "*if user wants to share the content of profile*") but the message construction is `unimplemented!()`, its only caller passes "without read_cap", and the receiver **discards** the cap. The shape is right; the implementation is absent. We emulate it meanwhile — filed as `orm-tests/INBOX/2026-07-27-inbox-cap-delivery-not-implemented.md`, including what to remove from this library once upstream lands it.
|
||
|
||
### 4. Key rotation — automatic redelivery, not loss of access
|
||
|
||
When a key is rotated, the new one is **sent to the inbox** of users who keep access, and that inbox is **processed automatically** as soon as one of the user's clients connects.
|
||
|
||
So access is not lost, it is **deferred** until the next connection — consistent with local-first. Consequences for the surface:
|
||
|
||
- **No subscription obligation to expose.** The consumer implements nothing to "keep" an access.
|
||
- Redelivery uses **the same channel** as the initial delivery, so §3 covers both with no special case.
|
||
- **Revocation** stays what it is: stop redelivering, non-retroactive.
|
||
|
||
> An earlier draft said the opposite ("whoever does not stay subscribed loses access"). That came from an upstream comment describing the **current state**, read as if it gave the **intention**. It does not. Source verifies a mechanism; it never states a direction.
|
||
|
||
### 5. Public content — readable by URL, and NOT recursive
|
||
|
||
> **An item in the public store is public: whoever has the URL reads the content.** But **not recursively** — public content may *reference* private content, and the reference does not grant access to what it references.
|
||
|
||
This is a **second mechanism** alongside key possession, not an exception to it. The non-recursiveness is what carries the value: it allows a public object that **points at** private identity without disclosing it — exactly the pattern the consumer needs.
|
||
|
||
*Implementation detail the shape must not depend on*: NextGraph is moving toward **not encrypting** public store content (data still signed). And if the public store does not behave as this principle describes, **this library adapts** — not the consumer.
|
||
|
||
### 6. What disappears or is renamed
|
||
|
||
| Today | Becomes |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| `grantRead(doc, grantee)` | `shareCap(cap, toInbox)` |
|
||
| `canRead(doc, principal)` | absorbed by `capFor(nuri)` — the `principal` parameter **was** the ACL inversion |
|
||
| `protectedDocsOf(owner)` | **removed** — the re-derivation loop disappears |
|
||
| `makePublic(doc)` | `publishRepoLink` — the shareable link has an upstream name (`RepoLinkV0`) |
|
||
| `grantWrite` / `canWrite` | deferred to P1b — currently **decorative** (the guard never fires) |
|
||
| `resetCaps()` on identity change | **switch** keyrings, do **not** wipe |
|
||
| `PrincipalId` in the cap surface | **removed** — recipients are inboxes |
|
||
|
||
`resetCaps()` is the trap that can make this lot look finished while it is not: if switching identity still wipes, durability is a lie and the per-session re-declaration comes back under another name.
|
||
|
||
### 7. Boundary: SDK-identical entry vs `/polyfill`
|
||
|
||
Caps live under `/polyfill` today; `index.ts` is the SDK-identical entry. Keep it that way, and keep `index.ts` signatures on plain strings — that **is** what the real SDK does. The discrimination lives in what you can **obtain** (the keyring), not in what the compiler permits.
|
||
|
||
### 8. Acceptance test — no cryptography required
|
||
|
||
`watch-shape` currently harvests **every** `did:ng:` string it finds in a discovery reference and folds those documents into the **read** set. A bare reference therefore grants **full read** today — the semantics exactly inverted.
|
||
|
||
After P1a: a harvested bare reference yields **nothing**, for want of a cap in the keyring — which is what real NextGraph does. The test holds without a line of encryption, which is what makes the P1a/P1b split honest rather than cosmetic.
|
||
|
||
## Consumer impact
|
||
|
||
`declareConnections` **disappears**. This is not an API swap: today it re-declares every grant on every session because the ACL is in-memory. With delivered caps, the grant moves to the moment a connection is **accepted**, and persists. Plan for consumer re-architecture, and update `../migration-guide.md`.
|
||
|
||
## What this lot does NOT do
|
||
|
||
Closing the read paths that bypass the guard — `docs.sparqlQuery`/`sparqlUpdate`, the whole inbox, `store-registry`, `discovery.readIndex`, `subscribe`, `open-repo`. Only four sites consult caps today. That inventory is P1b's scope and is listed in `2026-07-20-caps-emulation-alignment.md`.
|